| Item | Description | Owner | Notes | Action |
|---|
| 1 | Introduction and conflicts of interest | Scott Campbell | |
|
| 2 | Follow up items for London/Comments re: London meeting | Scott Campbell | Lorie requested information concerning IPaLM comment process for LOINC/SNOMED CT tech preview | Farzaneh provided links to Observables recording from London f2f.
Lorie will get back to IPaLM regarding any items she and colleagues wish to be addressed by the IPaLM |
| 3 | AP concept development and collaboration discussion | Scott Campbell | Raj Dash weighed in and supported current IPaLM approach and efforts discussed in London at face to face meeting. Suggested involving the Association of Path Informatics as a source of reference and input on concept modeling. | How do members of the IPaLM desire to be involved in content authoring/validation in AP? Thoughts on engaging pathology colleges |
| 4 | MP concept development and collaboration discussion | Scott Campbell | Discussion surrounding molecular pathology modeling within cancer worksheets. Daniel Karlsson will discuss in context of Observables project. | How do members of the IPaLM desire to be involved in content authoring/validation in MP? Thoughts on engaging pathology colleges |
| 5 | SNOMED II follow up | Deborah Drake | Not discussed | How can IPaLM assist? |
| 6 | Additional items? | Scott Campbell | Farzaneh will discuss GTM issues with IHTSDO staff when in London this week. | |