Date: 2021-02-24
Time:
1830- 2000 UTC
1030-1200 PDT
Zoom Meeting Details
Hi there,
Jim Case is inviting you to a scheduled SNOMED International Zoom meeting.
Topic: SNOMED Editorial Advisory Group Conference Call
Time: This is a recurring meeting Meet anytime
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android:
https://snomed.zoom.us/j/99997961770?pwd=TWRiclpVeTU3RG1kUE1lTWNkVFBCZz09
Password: 287392
Meeting ID: 999 9796 1770
Password: 287392
International numbers available: https://snomed.zoom.us/u/abTbQn2e26
Or Skype for Business (Lync):
https://snomed.zoom.us/skype/99997961770
Attendees
Chair:
AG Members
Meeting Files:
Objectives
- Obtain consensus on agenda items
Discussion items
Item | Description | Owner | Notes | Action |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Call to order and role call | Start recording! | ||
2 | Conflicts of interest and agenda review | No conflicts noted | ||
3 | FSN naming for "Pathologic neoplastic fractures" | Jim Case | Search of the literature yielded very few references with a consensus naming for this type of fracture. Search terms included:
As was agreed, these are not fractures DUE TO the neoplastic disease and have been modeled as co-occurrent. As there is no consensus naming for these, potential terming includes:
Discussion: Consider "Fracture of X with neoplastic bone disease". Is the neoplasm the cause of the weakened bone or is it possible that treatment or extranous condition resulted in the fracture? Prior uses implied that the neoplasm was in the bone. Suggesed "Fracture of X with neoplasm of X ". Treatments leading to osteoporosis could be classified under osteoporotic fractures. Additional discussion "Fracture of X at site of neoplasm" or "Pathologic fracture of X at site of neoplasm". Decision: Group consensus is to use "Pathologic fracture of X at site of neoplasm". |
|
4 | Concept Inactivation update and proposals | A presentation summarising the proposals detailed in the document 'Concept Inactivation - Proposed Amendments A request for the members to review and feedback on the document found on the Confluence web page: Concept Inactivation - Proposed Amendments A short discussion on 'where do we go from here' Discussion: Presentation covered and EAG tasked with review of the document and comments for the next EAG Call. | ||
5 | Glascow coma score and assessment scale components | Based on a discussion at the Anesthesia CRG and Observables Project there is a requirement to add more content for Glasgow Coma Scale Please see full discussion here: https://confluence.ihtsdotools.org/display/ACRGT/Glasgow+Coma+Score Presentation included with this agenda item suggesting common observables definitions. References to Standarization of the GCS: https://zibs.nl/wiki/GlasgowComaScale-v3.2(2020EN) https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/archetypes/1013.1.137/printable https://www.glasgowcomascale.org/ Draft document from Anesthesia CRG: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lZJlarREeIIRPk5E1zVtZUktLQlPH3G5/view?usp=sharing Discussions within Observables Project Group and and review of assessment scores deployed at Nebraska have proceeded with extended proposal for inclusion of assessment scales in use in Sweden as well as US. Modelling proposal added to Attachment s summarizing Assessment Scale Score Observables development: Clinical Scale Scores_20210224.pptx. Proposal promotes expanding content model for full definition of scales such as co-morbidity, Glasgow Coma Scale and SOFA scores. Anesthesia CRG wishes to explore further the best model for including definitions/explanations of Ordinal Scale score Value sets used in calculated scores. Discussion: Ongoing discussions with anesthesia and Observables groups. Scope expanded. Continued to the nest meeting. |
| |
6 | ECE Topics | Bruce Goldberg |
Discussion: Suggested that the use of DUE TO be constrained to the immediate cause as opposed to the entire causal chain. Combined disorders would always be considered co-occurrent. Modeling of multiple CLINICAL COURSE: For concepts where there are two clinical courses required, suggest adding the clinical course to each of the RGs representing the combined disorders. Some issues are whether the existing terms actually represent a proper term, such as an acute disorder due to a recurrent disorder. (Presentation is always acute). Including CLINICAL COURSE in the RG would require remodeling of many thousands of existing concepts. Question regarding adding the DUE TO relationship to RGs as well. This requires additional discussion. Contact dermatitis discussion continued to next call in March 2021 Decision: Combined disorders would be modeled as co-occurrent and a DUE TO relationship will be added for the immediate cause, if applicable. |
|
7 | Evaluation to Observables (E2O project) update | Daniel Karlsson@James Campbell |
| |
8 | Congenital aplasia modeling redux | Jim Case | Issues observed with inferences based on the original proposal have arisen that require a revised modeling pattern. Discussion located at: Re: Proposed remodeling of Congenital absence concepts - For discussion (revised) |
|
9 | Next meeting | EAG | March 24, 2021 | |