| Item | Description | Time | Owner | Notes and Discussion | Action |
|---|
April 8, 2019 |
| 1 | Call to order and role call Notice of recording Conflicts of Interest | 1330 - 1332h | | |
|
| Agenda review and approval | 1332 - 1335h | Jim Case |
| |
| ECE Update | 1335 - 1420h | Bruce Goldberg | - Follow-up discussion of injury, traumatic and non-traumatic
Injury_damage_traumatic_nontraumatic.pptx EAG agreed that use of DUE TO Event was a preferred way to represent "Traumatic injury" Additional discussion on approach to handle "non-traumatic injury" needed Secondary disorders including gout caused by drug.pptx Qry_Bruce usage report.xlsx | - BGO to write up proposal to use DUE TO Event to model "Traumatic injury"
- BGO to test use of GCIs to represent "Secondary disease"
- BGO to test alternative model for gout removing the relationship to hyperuricemia.
|
| Clinical content "Sources of truth" | 1420 - 1500h | | - Need to revisit the policy on adding text definitions from other sources
- Do we need to reference them if we paraphrase?
- Combined definitions from multiple sources may be required to fulfill the needs of SNOMED
- SNOMED definitions are not normative, but used to define the meaning of a concept as represented in SNOMED CT.
| |
| Break | 1500 - 1530h |
|
|
|
| Product role discussion | 1530 - 1600h | Toni Morrison | - Recognized that some product roles are needed to define other procedures and clinical findings
- Those needed existing roles can be temporarily modeled using additional axioms
- Warning language that this is a temporary situation while a more permanent solution is devised will be communicated to the community of practice, MF, CMAG, User-support group and GA(?)
| - Toni Morrison - to inactivate product roles that are not used to define other concepts.
- Toni Morrison to work with KKU to develop a communication plan for existing product roles
|
| Device project introduction | 1600 - 1615h | Toni Morrison | See slides attached |
|
| Historical association refset | 1615 - 1700h | | - Consideration of addition of "Withdrawn"
- Concept Inactivation
- From prior discussion, things you can say about an inactivated concept
- 1..1 exact match - SAME AS
- 1..X same as one or more concepts - MAY BE
- Subtype of - WAS A
- What is the use case for REPLACED BY? For erroneous concepts, out of date concepts? Does it provide additional value to make this distinction?
- SAME AS: A = B, B = A
- REPLACED BY: A <> B ?
- Need to ensure that the semantic granularity is similar for "replacement" concepts.
- How do we ensure consistent usage? Tooling currently constrains associations allowed for specific inactivation types
- Do AMBIGUOUS concepts require 2..X MAY BE historical relationships?
- MOVED TO and MOVED FROM needs to reflect RF2 structures (i.e. modules as opposed to namespaces)
- WAS A relationships can be constructed from the release files
- Are additional historical relationships needed to fill gaps in retrieval or analysis?
- Concepts inactivated without a historical relationship (i.e. non-conformance to editorial policy) have an implied WAS A
- Three aspects need to be considered:
- Consistent historical relationship assignment by authors
- Guidance for users to correctly use these relationship
- From a QA perspective, cleanup of existing relationship to improve internal consistency
- Should this be partially addressed by derivatives?
Discussion - Audiences that need to be supported by improved historical relationships:
Content editors - selection of proper historical associations when inactivating or moving concepts. Data analysts who need a comprehensive history mechanism for traceability and data healing. Implementors who need to know how to replace concepts that are either changed or moved or something else. - End user clinician who is trying to record something and all of a sudden his favorite concept has disappeared.
| - Jim Case to work with SI tech team to inactivate existing WAS A relationships
- Jim Case to communicate to content team that WAS A relationships no longer have to be maintained
- Anne Randorff Højen, Jeff Pierson and Brian Carlsen to begin to develop use cases of concept life cycles and needed historical relationships
- Jeremy Rogers to provide examples of existing historical relationships of questionable correctness
|
| Adjourn | 1700h |
|
|
|
April 9, 2019 |
| Call to order and role call Notice of recording Conflicts of Interest | 0900 - 0905h | Jim Case |
|
|
| Resolving the finding/disorder conundrum | 0905 - 1030h | | Background document:
|
|
| Break | 1030 - 1100h |
|
|
|
| Proposed SNOMED CT Content Strategy | 1100 - 1230h | Jim Case | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|