There are a number of codes that have been associated with transness, many of which SNOMED has carried on as legacy terms, which are no longer current in terms of diagnostic guidelines.
Powered by a free Atlassian Confluence Community License granted to SNOMED International. Evaluate Confluence today.
4 Comments
Clair Kronk
There has been a major move to depathologize transness, as homosexuality was somewhat depathologized in the 1970s (but kept around as a "legacy" term as "ego-dystonic sexual orientation" so that psychologists and psychiatrists could continue to "diagnose" gay people). In a similar fashion, we have seen "transsexualism" move to "gender identity disorder" and then to "gender dysphoria" and now "gender incongruence".
Currently, SNOMED still contains the antiquated terms related to "gender identity disorder" which have been removed from modern diagnostic guidelines. It is recommended that they be removed or folded into another term outside the "disorder" hierarchy (preferably in the finding hierarchy). Additionally, separation of these terms by age group is not helpful and can lead to further pathologization. Age at diagnosis can be indicated elsewhere and is not part of a diagnosis (supposedly they represent "age of onset" but there is no "onset" of transness, it just is).
Likewise, "dual-role transvestism" and "fetishistic transvestism" have no consistent diagnostic guidelines and should be removed.
Additionally, "gender dysphoria" should be moved out of the "disorder" hierarchy and into the finding hierarchy, being more consistent with current treatment guidelines and depathologization.
The proposal that I made in the forthcoming document we will discuss, based on this information (as well as the forthcoming ICD-11), was:
Much of this was based on information here (https://genderdysphoria.fyi/gdb) and the depathologization efforts I mentioned above. There are, however, a few things I want to note:
It has been shown that cisgender women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) experience gender dysphoria under clinical definitions (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22443151/). It may be possible that cisgender people who experience distress in their differentiation from the "norm" of a gender provided in a given sociocultural context may also.
The diagnostic criteria ascribed to the two are different and are used in different contexts.
The WHO (ICD-11) defines "gender incongruence" as "characterized by a marked and persistent incongruence between an individual's experienced gender and the assigned sex".
The APA (DSM-5) provides a list of criteria for diagnosis which subsumes the ICD-11 definition above but does not necessarily include it.
The criteria are at least two of the following:
Granted, these are already massively out of date and do not account for the existence of nonbinary people at all, but they are the criteria as they currently exist.
Separating the two allows for greater conceptual clarity, inclusion of more diverse forms of gender-related differences, more alignment with current standards, and further depathologization of transness and gender diversity.
It is important to have gender euphoria for two reasons: (1) not all trans people experience gender dysphoria, some simply experience euphoria which is connected to gender identity aligning with their body, pronouns, name, etc.; and (2) gender dysphoria may resolve and there is no way to indicate it-- instead providers have to label trans patients as "gender dysphoric" for their entire lives even if they are no longer dysphoric.
Gender congruence fulfills a similar role and allows a provider to mark that things are going well, actually. That the patient is living a fulfilled life and has a history of incongruence which is no longer present.
This is a term that Community-Based Research Centre (CBRC) (https://www.cbrc.net/) coined last year to describe a state which is between euphoria and dysphoria. It is slowly gained a bit of traction, and I included it for the sake of completion (and to account for intermediate phases between dysphoria and euphoria), but I could go either way on its inclusion.
Francis Lau
Hi Clair, thanks so much for this discussion thread. It is clear you have put a lot of thinking and effort into analysing these terms and relationships. So kudo to you for the work. I am still trying to digest all of this information and have a few comments and questions so please bear with me ...
Thanks -francis
Clair Kronk
Hi Francis Lau !
Thanks for all of the questions, I much appreciate it! I'll do my best to go through one-by-one.
Clair Kronk
Update: I've asked 372 trans people about whether they believe including subtypes like physical dysphoria, social dysphoria, etc., would be useful.
41% said it would be helpful. 15% said it would not be helpful. 29% said it might be helpful.
Here are some of their comments indicating negatives:
Etc., etc.
Will this in mind. I'd like to pull back the proposal to:
Mood finding