Uncategorized

Status: All

New
In discussion
Resolved
No corresponding status

Creators: All

Current user

No specific user

Creation period

Choose creation period

ideation.btn.close

Today Last week Last month Reset

Categories: All

Open
On Hold
Resolved
No corresponding category

Change of Laparoscopic procedure modelling

Added by Matt Cordell on Jun 21, 2024

I wanted to discuss the changes to the Laparoscopic content that were published November 2023 (and continue to trickle through since). Since I suspect EAG members not maintaining an extension may not have noticed. While I appreciate some change may have been required my concerns fall into two parts: The actual “implemented solution” The execution of the change The actual “implemented solution”. For context Endoscopy and endoscopic procedures - SNOMED CT Editorial Guide - SNOMED Conflue

Status: New 279 View 0 Comment Comments enabled In the category: Undefined

Editorial guidance on numeric ranges in FSN

Added by Toni Morrison on Aug 23, 2016

Following up from the Editorial AG cal 22-Aug, additional examples from existing content have been identified. Note that examples from the Product hierarchy have been excluded as specific guidelines for this hierarchy will be developed and the hierarchy does not include ranges (with isolated exceptions). Midwife attends 1-10 days post-discharge (finding) Midwife attends 25-28 days post-discharge (finding) On examination - height 10-20% over average (finding) On examination - weight

Status: In discussion 2598 View 1 Comment Comments enabled In the category: Undefined

Comment Last contribution, May 28, 2024. All contributions

Jim Case

Current editorial guidance does not support numeric ranges unless internationally agreed.

Should we continue to add diagnostic imaging of multiple body sites

Added by Monica Harry on Jul 27, 2016

Discussions from the Editorial Panel

Status: In discussion 2863 View 1 Comment Comments enabled In the category: Undefined

Comment Last contribution, Jul 27, 2016. All contributions

Monica Harry

We receive requests for DI concepts for multiple procedures and body sites and have in the past rejected these as overly pre-coordinated. The decision was based on no combined procedures, no laterality etc as specified in Editorial Guidance. There was a decision to write up some guidance on this for the Editorial Guide. Could you as a group provide such guidance or a statement as to our policy and decsion? Examples include: Computed tomography angiography of aorta, abdomen, pelvis and lower limb (procedure) Ultrasonography of abdomen and ultrasonography of pelvis with transrectal ultrasonography (procedure) Ultrasonography of pelvis and obstetric ultrasonography with transvaginal ultrasonography (procedure) Ultrasonography of knee and doppler ultrasonography of vein of lower limb (procedure) Thank you.

	Topic	Status	Author	View	Replies	Creation date	Last Reply	Contributors	Category
Discussion	Change of Laparoscopic procedure modelling	New	Matt Cordell	View 279	Comment 0	1718929171000 Jun 21, 2024 00:19	0 -	0 -	Undefined
Discussion	Editorial guidance on numeric ranges in FSN	In discussion	Toni Morrison	View 2598	Comment 1	1471972737000 Aug 23, 2016 17:18	May 28, 2024 20:00	1	Undefined
Question	Should we continue to add diagnostic imaging of multiple body sites	In discussion	Monica Harry	View 2863	Comment 1	1469648240000 Jul 27, 2016 19:37	Jul 27, 2016 19:45	1	Undefined

Page tree

Page Not Available

Choose creation period

Jim Case

Monica Harry

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30	31