| Item | Description | Owner | Notes | Action |
|---|
| 1 | Update on actions | All | - Ian had issued individual spreadsheets to Kathy and Susan and they had done next 25+ of diagnose and returned to Ian. Now entered in shared google sheet.
| |
| 2 | Key points | All | - Not taking into account translation at this point, focusing on meaning - though recognised that translation issues may feed in to meaning clarification
- Whilst we are not producing a map, only the Refset, a map will be needed to support those currently using ICNP to migrate and for historical purposes.
- There are concepts which are fundamentally different, e.g. Adherence v compliance. These will need to be fully discussed and reach consensus on - cannot be shelved for later.
|
|
| 3 | Next steps | All | Agreed the following outline process: - Reviewers to work on 50 items per week (next batch by 24 July)
- Ian to issue the 50 items to each reviewer in separate files - beginning of week
- Reviewers provide expert decisions - close of play Friday same week
- Ian to pull together into shared sheet - following Monday
- Review results - following tuesday:
- Where both reviewers agree on a match (Y,Y) - accepted, no further discussion
- Where reviewers do not agree - meet to discuss and try to reach consensus, fully document.
- Where reviewers cannot reach consensus, discussed by wider group
- No match - potential addition. Nick to review and provide further explanation of ICNP concept.
- No matches + Nick's information provided to Cathy to review and decide on next steps
| - Jane to document process separately
- Ian provide addition column for reviewers consensus view
- Ian to issue next batch 50 17 July
- Ian identify process for providing Nick with list of no matches and then information across to Cathy
|
| 4. | Future meetings | All | - Reviewers to meet to deal with the concepts they do not agree on - initially weekly. Jane/Ian to attend
- Project Group to meet again when there is work to discuss and to discuss approach and progress
| - Jane to set up weekly call for reviewers to reach consensus
|