SNOMED CT Templates

Page tree

Descriptions:

Termdescription typeLanguage/acceptabilityLanguage/acceptabilityCase significance

[course] [periods of life][morphology] of [body structure] due to [clinical finding/disease] (disorder)

FSNus:Pgb:Pci

[course] [periods of life][morphology] of [body structure] due to [clinical finding/disease]

SYNus:Pgb:Pci


Concept model:

Attribute cardinalityAttributeValuerole group numberRole group cardinality
1..1

116680003 |Is a (attribute)|

64572001 |Disease (disorder)|

0



N/A

0..1

263502005 |Clinical course (attribute)|

<  288524001 |Courses (qualifier value)|

10..1
1.1

42752001 |Due to (attribute)|

<  404684003 |Clinical finding (finding)|

2



1..1

1..1

116676008 |Associated morphology (attribute)|

<<  44132006 |Abscess (morphologic abnormality)|


3






1..*

@rolegroup

0..1

363698007 |Finding site (attribute)|

<  123037004 |Body structure (body structure)|

3
0..1

370135005 |Pathological process (attribute)|

<  308489006 |Pathological process (qualifier value)|

3
0..1

246075003 |Causative agent (attribute)|

<  410607006 |Organism (organism)|

3

Definition status:  


900000000000073002 |Defined|

Applies to

<< 128477000 |Abscess (disorder)| : 42752001 |Due to (attribute)| = *

Template Language

64572001 |Disease (disorder)| : [[~0..1]] { [[~0..1]]  263502005 |Clinical course (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<   288524001 |Courses (qualifier value)| ) @course]] }, [[~1..1]] {[[~1..1]]  42752001 |Due to (attribute)|  = [[ +id ( <  404684003 |Clinical finding (finding)| ) @dueto]]}, [[~1..* @rolegroup]]{ [[~1..1]]  116676008 |Associated morphology (attribute)|  = [[+id(<<  44132006 |Abscess (morphologic abnormality)| ) @morphology ]], [[~0..1]]  363698007 |Finding site (attribute)|  = [[+id(<  123037004 |Body structure (body structure)| )]], [[~0..1]]  370135005 |Pathological process (attribute)|  = [[ +id ( <  308489006 |Pathological process (qualifier value)| ) @proc]], [[~0..1]]  246075003 |Causative agent (attribute)|  = [[ +id (<  410607006 |Organism (organism)| ) @causative]] }


Rules for generating descriptions:

  1. Apply General rules for generating descriptions for templates
  2. Appy Enhancements for the Template Language;


Jira ticket:

QI-210 - Getting issue details... STATUS

INFRA-3262 - Getting issue details... STATUS



  • No labels

8 Comments

  1. Bruce Goldberg

    Peter G. Williams , please update template language

  2. Peter G. Williams

    There we go Bruce Goldberg.   Another case where I think Disease is redundant in the presence of Clinical Finding.

    There are 24 misaligned concepts for this template (only 1 matching) but this is always because some other not-abcess morphology is present.    See https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13IqqF9EvyYkSiwLgIplqtvbMgaIkRBF2U4ZGnDEE3aw/edit#gid=0

    1. Bruce Goldberg

      Hi Peter G. Williams. I went ahead and corrected this as well as the others with a redundant disease assertion.


      Thanks,

      Bruce

  3. Jim Case

    What is the use case for CLINICAL COURSE and OCCURRENCE here?

  4. Bruce Goldberg

    Jim, I copied this from an existing and approved template, where I just added a due to relationship. I think an optional due to relationship could just be added to the existing template and this one deleted. The existing template which I did not work on, had CLINICAL COURSE and OCCURRENCE relationships. There are many existing acute and chronic abscess concepts so clinical course is appropriate. I don't see a need for the OCCURRENCE attribute.

    Abscess of [body structure] - Ready for implementation

  5. Cathy Richardson

    Jim Case Is this template okay to go?

    Bruce Goldberg FYI

  6. Jim Case

    Cathy Richardson ,

    As Bruce mentioned, I think that by just adding an optional DUE TO relationship the the Abscess of [body structure] template, we can accomplish the same thing.  I did a quick check and we only have one abscess concept that had an occurrence relationship,  276679003 |Neonatal breast abscess (disorder)|, so we can make that one term and exception in the misaligned concept report or add an optional OCCURRENCE attribute (I would go for the former).  So I would opt for making the change to the existing template and deleting this one.

  7. Bruce Goldberg

    Cathy, Sorry, I thought we were talking about the original template. There are several combined disorder concepts that I am coming across of the type X due to Y where X is defined by an existing template and for which adding an optional due to (or temporal) relationship would suffice. I am trying to add a comment to the existing template and I should be removing those templates I have created for X due to/after Y where a template for X exists.


    Bruce