Content Managers Advisory Group

Page tree


Matt Cordell

Owner
2099 View 6 Comment In discussion Comments enabled In the category: Undefined

I've just had a colleague point out this slide in the current Implementation course which contradicts the current editorial approach.

I'm wondering how widely this change has been communicated?

Contributors (4)

6 Comments

  1. Cathy Richardson

    Matt Cordell, just letting you know that I'm following up on this from the SNOMED International perspective. Regards, Cathy.

  2. Lesley MacNeil

    Hi Matt Matt Cordell- where and when is this slide deck from?

  3. Elze de Groot

    I missed the change in editorial approach actually. (I did see the numbers in the international edition and wondered what they were doing there). Where can I find this decision?

  4. Cathy Richardson

    Elze de Groot, you'll find the Editorial guidance on this in Section 6.2.10.1 on this page 6.2.10 Qualifier value, it touches on the rationale. 

  5. Cathy Richardson

    Matt Cordell, In relation to the difference between the educational presentation and the Editorial Guide, the Editorial Guide is the one to follow. The need to update the educational material has been noted. Regards, Cathy.

  6. David Markwell

    Added task to JIRA as ELPM-101 

    Presentation has now been updated. Including change to the relevant bullet and narrative and an added note on slide 38

    Update notes added in November 2017:
    •In 2017 an approach to modeling drug strengths
    using concepts that represent numbers was adopted
    •Future changes are likely to enable more complete
    representation of concrete domains