Item | Description | Owner | Time | Notes | Action |
---|
1 | Welcome | | | - Attendees list
- Introductions
- Note:
- The meeting will be recorded for the purpose of creating minutes. The recording of meeting will be available online to the SNOMED International community of practice until minutes are approved.
- Joining the meeting by accepting the Zoom prompt declares that you have no objection to your comments being recorded
|
|
2 | Administration | | | | |
3 | Content Tracker Status | | | - Information in slide deck
| |
4 | CMAG - profile and activity | | 10 mins | - A presentation was given to the MF in August 2024, MSUG - October 2024 with the aim to raise the profile of the CMAG and the purpose of the group. We've had two countries put forward representatives following the presentation.
- Looking to increase our meeting frequency - support goal of increased group effectiveness and output
- Two face to face (April, October), Four virtual (Early February, June, Late August, Early December)
|
|
5 | Terms of Reference | Cathy Richardson | 10 mins | - Terms of Reference have been updated - changes explained as noted on slide in slide deck. A draft has been attached.
- Group comments sought. Nil at the meeting.
- Group asked to provide feedback by 20th November.
| Terms of Reference Review Action Item |
6 | Introducing the Modelling Forum | | 10 mins | - National Content Modelling Discussion Forum
Set up of a national forum where national authors can raise modelling queries. Would be for the NRC's by the NRC's. SNOMED International may comment, support. Freshdesk query responses only seen by the requestor and there could be others with questions. An avenue to share knowledge. Could be a standing item on CMAG agenda. - Feedback during meeting
- Supported by attendees
- (GE) Discussions can take time, so an agenda item may not provide enough time. A separate meeting may be a better option.
- (TA) Good idea being able to share. Supports comments by (GE)
- (EG) Supports as well. Query on international content, could that be brought that way. Time taken to report issues is time consuming.
- (MB) CRS required for issues on international content. Provides us with an audit trail. Supported by (CR)
- (LM) Question clarifying structure of forum. Agreed on idea.
- (CR) Will have a site somewhere. Could be a Freshdesk Forum or a site on Confluence. Options to be explored. Needs to be something where models could be posted. Also need to consider how best viewed publicly. Will come back to group on options. Can be brought to meetings as required.
|
|
7 | Reactivation in an extension - international concept | Cathy Richardson | 10 mins | - Presentation (included in the slide deck) on guidance for
- reactivation of an inactivated International concept within an extension
- creation of an historical association between the extension concept (where it is used as a replacement) and the inactivated international concept.
- Guidance has been added to the Extensions Practical Guide
- Thank you to the UK for providing the information on their process for reactivation.
- Discussion on potential for reactivation in more than one extension - we wouldn't know if this occurred. The multi browser could be checked. Query on how the Managed Service Authoring Platform and multi browser would work if reactivated in more than one extension. There are still technical aspects in relation to this to clarify.
- If SNOMED International reactivate a concept we think it is the most recent effective time that is used. This will be confirmed.
|
|
8 | National content work | Group | 30 mins | - Update from CMAG members on upcoming national content activities and advice on past work which may be of interest to others
- National Content Development Activities
- Netherlands
- Sectors to implement SNOMED - nursing, primary care, Allied health (paramedics, physiotherapists, dieticians), prevention for youth care - (social care, vaccinations, environmental, child development) mental health and hospitals.
- Expecting request for content in these areas. For hospitals there is already a lot of diagnosis and procedure concepts and are planning to promote that relevant to other countries.
- Working on allergies, substances, patient friendly terms, synoptic reporting, lab codes, European patient summary.
- ICF is important for the paramedics.
- UK (GE)
- Request received from Genomics, England to add genes to SNOMED - over 4000. Work being scoped but not clear if they should be added at this point.
- Imaging procedures. UK has a separate terminology for imaging called NICIP - they are currently mapped to SNOMED but not all 1 to 1. A lot of content is lateralised in NICIP but not in SNOMED. A content work proposal for (about 600 lateralised) concepts is being/has been submitted to SNOMED International.
- Pathology - improving modelling of observables modelling. Discussions with others to ensure work isn't being duplicated.
- Norway (TA)
- Heavy reliance on mapping SNOMED, ICD and ICPC2. Creating a handbook on how to start big projects in mapping.
- Significant work occurring in nursing content development. Have promoted some concepts to International Edition.
- CR commented- some international content from Norway's version of the ICNP refset has been reviewed by ICN and added to the International ICNP refset.
- Translation of nutrition refset. See overlap between this and nursing.
- Request for fetal diagnostics - lack about 380 concepts. Exist as congenital content but not fetal.
- Request from a local region to look at the definition of pain. Looking to see if others have received a request in this area.
- CR advised Nursing CRG had had discussions in this area.
- Mental health
- Work on drug content.
- US (JS)
- Gravity project (SDOH) - utilities work. Discussions on difference between insecurity and poverty. Poverty more acceptable internationally.
- SOGI content. Request to come for about 12 concepts for promotion from Canada. Also some clean up requests in this area in the international.
- NZ would be interested in connecting in relation to this work.
- Laboratory specimen condition and rejection reasons.
- NZ (LM)
- Health service type reference set - adding patient friendly and Te Reo Māori terms.
- Working with Cancer control agency - new concepts for histology, topography, grading and staging.
- Other countries - please see Denmarks new pregnancy work file.
- (EW) For those working in Mental Health, the MABH CRG would be interested in what you are working on.
|
|
9 | 2025 CMAG Work Plan | Group | 10 mins | - CMAG 2025 Work Plan
- Anything else the CMAG reps think the group should be working on?
- No comments on the plan or new items in the meeting.
| CMAG 2025 Work Plan |
10 | Other business |
|
| - (JS) - presentation on how to submit a content proposal for larger work items and the internal processes to have these evaluated.
- Finding/disorder boundary had been raised outside of the meeting by Belgium.
- Both items will be added to the December agenda.
|
|
11 | Next Meeting | Cathy Richardson |
| - Early December 2024 - date and time to be advised.
|
|
11 Comments
Cathy Richardson
Please see the Canadian, Australian and Danish National Content Development activities listed on the blog post: Re: CMAG October Agenda
Janice Spence
Hello Graeme Elsby or Cathy Richardson I wonder if you could provide more info on this item from UK?
This work is of interest in terms of avoidance of potential duplication as the CA NRC has about 570+ concepts for lateralized disorders in backlog for submission to core (plus 150 currently in CRS queue) due to SLA limits. Thanks!
Graeme Elsby
Hi Janice Spence , I would be happy to share the list of imaging procedures that we would be looking to get lateralised.
Matt Cordell
Hi Graeme Elsby and Janice Spence ,
We are in a very similar position, of requiring a batch of lateralised imaging content in Australia. I've just emailed Janice, but if you're able to share the gap list you have I can compare to what we have. (matt.cordell@csiro.au)
It would be great to not duplicate work in the different extensions.
Cheers,
John Snyder
Hi Graeme Elsby, Janice Spence Matt Cordell ;
Has anyone looked at the radiology content in LOINC that was added under the agreement with Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) to add the LOINC/RSNA Radiology Playbook User Guide to LOINC?
There appear to be both lateralized, bilaterial, and non-lateralized content available.
I know that most people are not using LOINC, however, if there is significant enough interest from multiple member countries it could increase the priority to have this content added to the LOINC/SNOMED Extension so that it is available through SNOMED. There appear to be about 7297 concepts that cover all different radiology modalities. It may be faster to programmatically translate this content into SNOMED and then add any residual missing content rather than trying to start adding content from scratch?
Just a thought.
Janice Spence
Thanks John Snyder Matt Cordell I believe when these 2 MI projects we are supporting started, LOINC was not as enriched as it is today with imaging procedures and so SCT was chosen, and it was just not revisited given they had already gone down this path. The suggestion to look at synergizing the 2 terminologies is interesting. However, most of what we have outstanding for promotion to core now are lateralized disorders. We do have imaged guided procedures that we have kept in the extension. I can share those with Matt as well. Thanks!
Graeme Elsby
Hi John Snyder ,
Thank you for highlighting this, it is definitely something I would be interested in looking at, when I get the time.
Graeme Elsby
Hi Matt Cordell ,
Not a problem, I will get our list out to you and Janice today. I had to tidy it up a bit as the last iteration was based on the 20240201 SI release, so I have brought it up to where we currently are in the UK which is the 20240801 SI release, though I did compare with the 20241101 SI release to make sure all the concepts are still active.
Janice Spence
Thanks Graeme Elsby . That would be great! My contact is jspence@infoway-inforoute.ca . Much appreciated!
Camilla Wiberg Danielsen
This is a lot of preoordinations. This group has another ongoing discussion about Re: Postcoordination Use in country.
Also, ICD is going in the direction of postcoordination. So, how will this affect the (hopefully) mappings between ICD-11 and SNOMED CT?
Matt Cordell
Thanks Camilla,
I haven't got access to the MF discussion unfortunately, but will see if I can.
The problem with postcoordination is that it could mean different things...
There's potential for nonsense combinations if implementers don't put checks in place (more work). There's also user experience and "number of clicks" considerations.
I'm less concerned about combinatorial explosion now days if it reduces the barriers to adoption. And it's based on demand/requirements. A mix of precoordinated concepts to a specific scope (Procedure catalogues are usually finite set of combinations) and using other fields for additional nuance.