Title | ||
---|---|---|
Narrative description(Describe the inactivation scenario in a few lines) | 2 concepts appear to have the same meaning. This may arise for the following reasons:
| |
Details(Provide specifics about the scenario to support comparison to other scenarios) | What is being inactivated (concept/description/any component)? | The duplicate concept is being inactivated |
What is the reason for inactivation (description)? | The 2 concepts are considered to be semantically equivalent | |
Which inactivation value should be used? | Duplicate component | |
Which historical association reference set should be used? | SAME AS association reference set (foundation metadata concept) | |
Known issues(Describe any issues that may occur for this scenario and which may complicate interpretation of the inactivation) |
| |
Impact(Describe how specific stakeholders are affected by the inactivation) |
| Requirement to establish true semantic equivalence |
| ||
| Review and update refsets | |
| ||
Potential improvement(Provide an indication of whether the current inactivation mechanism for this scenario is sufficient, or provide your ideas or thoughts on potential improvements) | ||
Supporting resources(Provide links to any resources relevant for this scenario) | <url> | <comment> |