You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.
Compare with Current
View Page History
Version 1
Next »
Goals
- Discuss next priorities
- Review proposed updates to URI standard
- Review proposed Query language examples
- Explore additional questions posed by Daniel
Agenda and Meeting Notes
| | |
---|
Welcome and apologies | | - Review proposed Query language examples
- Explore additional questions posed by Daniel
|
Next priorities | | Recent publication of: Outstanding work items: - Updates to SNOMED CT URI standard
- Development of SNOMED CT Query Language
- SNOMED CT Expression Constraint Template Language
- Addition of new features to the SNOMED CT Template Syntax
- Repository of normative expression constraint results
- Others?
|
Proposed updates to URI standard | | Updates to SNOMED CT URI standard |
Query Language | | - Review proposed Query Language examples
- Additional requirements from SLPG members?
|
Questions from Daniel | | Discuss questions from Daniel (if time permits) - to support expression repositories (i.e. where the substrate is dynamic in that expressions could be added), do we need to add the ability to use the ECL to apply constraint operators to post-coordinated expressions, i.e. where a piece of the ECL string is to be interpreted as a SCG expression, e.g. << [ 404684003 | Clinical finding (finding) |: 363698007 |Finding site (attribute)| = 10200004 | Liver structure (body structure) | ]? This would correspond to a DL query.
- to support potential expansion of the SNOMED CT logic profile, do we need to extend SCG to support axioms as opposed to only expressions, for example to allow (non-hidden) GCAs to be stated in SCG?
- we need an SNOMED CT OWL specification, i.e. how is SNOMED CT (concepts and descriptions) represented in OWL. Is this within the scope of this group?
|
Confirm next meeting date/time | | Next meeting to be held at 20:00 UTC on Wednesday 30th August 2017 |
Meeting Files
No files shared here yet.