Title | ||
---|---|---|
Narrative description(Describe the inactivation scenario in a few lines) | From time to time editorial policy may change, either to support changes in modelling practice, to update our approach to what is considered to be within scope for the international edition of SNOMED CT or bring consistency to existing content. Sometimes when this is done the meaning of an FSN or the implied meaning of a logical definition may change the meaning of an existing SNOMED CT concept. When a change of meaning occurs the legacy concept should be inactivated and where appropriate a replacement concept be created if an equivalent concept does not already exist. | |
Details(Provide specifics about the scenario to support comparison to other scenarios) | What is being inactivated (concept/description/any component)? | The concept which is considered to be non-conformant to editorial policy |
What is the reason for inactivation (description)? | Either the FSN or the logical definition does not conform to current editorial policy | |
Which inactivation value should be used? | The concept is non-conformant to editorial policy | |
Which historical association reference set should be used? | Currently no association required | |
Known issues(Describe any issues that may occur for this scenario and which may complicate interpretation of the inactivation) |
| |
Examples | Simple Example | |
Complex Example | ||
Erroneous Example | ||
Impact(Describe how specific stakeholders are affected by the inactivation) |
|
|
| ||
| ||
| Impact depends upon:
| |
Potential improvement(Provide an indication of whether the current inactivation mechanism for this scenario is sufficient, or provide your ideas or thoughts on potential improvements) |
| |
Supporting resources(Provide links to any resources relevant for this scenario) | <url> | <comment> |