The appendix contains an extended version of 2.3.2 Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Definitions supported by more detailed examples.
Excerpt Include |
---|
| 2.3.2 Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Definitions |
---|
| 2.3.2 Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Definitions |
---|
nopanel | true |
---|
|
A Definition that is Both Necessary and Sufficient
The definition shown in
Caption reference |
---|
CapRefId | stated-view-procedures |
---|
CapRefType | Table |
---|
|
provides an example of a simple case.
- The === symbol indicates that the concept definition is equivalent to the concept.
- This means that each of the assertions in the definition is necessarily true for all instance of the concept
Concept |
---|
t | 710785000 |Laparoscopic repair of hernia| |
---|
|
. - It also means that this definition is sufficient, because if all the assertions are true, this implies this is either the concept or a subtype of the concept.
Caption label |
---|
CapId | stated-view-procedures |
---|
CapType | Table |
---|
|
Stated view of the definition of |Laparoscopic repair of hernia| |
Concept | Stated View of Concept Definition |
Concept |
---|
t | 710785000 |Laparoscopic repair of hernia| |
---|
|
| Scg expression |
---|
=== 71388002 |Procedure| :
{ 363700003 |Direct morphology| = 414402003 |Hernial opening (morphologic abnormality)|,
425391005 |Using access device| = 86174004 |Laparoscope, device|,
260686004 |Method| = 257903006 |Repair - action| } |
|
| |
The definition shown in
Caption reference |
---|
CapRefId | stated-view-primitive |
---|
CapRefType | Table |
---|
|
provides an example of another common case.
- The === symbol indicates that the concept definition is equivalent to the concept.
- This means that each of the assertions in the definition necessarily true for all instance of the concept
Concept |
---|
t | 710785000 |Laparoscopic repair of hernia| |
---|
|
. - It also means that this definition is sufficient, because if all the assertions are true, this implies this is either the concept or a subtype of the concept.
A Definition that is Necessary but Not Sufficient
The definition shown in
Caption reference |
---|
CapRefId | stated-view-primitive |
---|
CapRefType | Table |
---|
|
provides an example of another simple case.
- The <<< symbol indicates that the concept is a subtype of the concept definition.
- This means that each of the assertions in the definition is necessarily true for all instance of the concept
Concept |
---|
t | 173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)| |
---|
|
. - However, this definition is not sufficient, because it is represent a more general meaning. Put another way, it does not capture one or more distinguishing features or the
Concept |
---|
t | 173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)| |
---|
|
. This means that even if all the assertions are true, it may or may not be this concept or one of its subtypes.
Caption label |
---|
CapId | stated-view-primitive |
---|
CapType | Table |
---|
|
Stated view of the definition of |Acute benign pericarditis| |
Concept | Stated View of Concept Definition |
Concept |
---|
t | 173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)| |
---|
|
| Scg expression |
---|
<<< 64572001 |Disease| :
263502005 |Clinical course| = 424124008 |Sudden onset AND/OR short duration|
{ 116676008 |Associated morphology | = 4532008 |Acute inflammation| ,
363698007 |Finding site| = 24949005 |Pericardial sac structure| } |
|
| |
A Definition that is Sufficient with Assertions that are Not Necessarily True
Note |
---|
This example is illustrates a type of definition that was not supported prior to the enhancement to SNOMED CT support for advanced description logic. Therefore, the definition shown is for illustration only and will not be found in current releases of SNOMED. |
The definition shown in
Caption reference |
---|
CapRefId | stated-view-secondary-dm |
---|
CapRefType | Table |
---|
|
provides an example of a more complex case.
- The >>> symbol indicates that the concept definition represents a subtype of the concept definition.
- This means that each of the assertions in the definition is necessarily true for all instance of the concept
Concept |
---|
t | 173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)| |
---|
|
. - However, this definition is not sufficient, because it is represent a more general meaning. Put another way, it does not capture one or more distinguishing features or the
Concept |
---|
t | 173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)| |
---|
|
. This means that even if all the assertions are true, it may or may not be this concept or one of its subtypes.
Caption label |
---|
CapId | stated-view-primitive |
---|
CapType | Table |
---|
|
Possible stated view of the definition of |Secondary diabetes mellitus| |
Concept | Stated View of Concept Definition |
Concept |
---|
t | 8801005 |Secondary diabetes mellitus (disorder)| |
---|
|
| Scg expression |
---|
>>>73211009 |Diabetes mellitus|:
246075003 |Causative agent| = 105590001 |Substance|
OR
>>>73211009 |Diabetes mellitus|:
42752001 |Due to| = 64572001 |Disease| |
|
| |
Sufficiently Defined
Glossary include |
---|
Gloss | sufficiently defined concept |
---|
Suffix | is |
---|
Def | inline |
---|
Example | true |
---|
Note | true |
---|
Prefix | A |
---|
|
Primitive
Glossary include |
---|
Gloss | primitive concept |
---|
Suffix | is |
---|
Def | inline |
---|
Example | true |
---|
Note | true |
---|
Prefix | A |
---|
|
Necessary Conditions
All SNOMED CT defining relationships currently released are necessarily (always) true for the concept defined. Relationships that are necessarily true are also know as necessary conditions.
Glossary include |
---|
Gloss | necessary condition |
---|
Suffix | is defined as |
---|
Def | inline |
---|
Example | true |
---|
Prefix | A |
---|
|
Sufficient Sets of Conditions
In practice there can be several sufficient definitions for a concept. That is to say several different ways in which a concept could be sufficiently defined by different sets of
Gloss |
---|
PreSpace | false |
---|
t | defining relationships |
---|
|
For example:
Gastric ulcer is defined as follows:
Scg expression |
---|
397825006|gastric ulcer|
=== 116680003 |is a| = 64572001 |disease|
{ 116676008 |associated morphology| = 56208002 |ulcer| ,
363698007 |finding site| =69695003 |stomach structure| } |
This is a sufficient definition because any
Concept |
---|
t | 56208002|ulcer| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
in a
Concept |
---|
t | 69695003|stomach structure| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
is by definition a
Concept |
---|
t | 397825006|gastric ulcer|. |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
Based on this definition:
Any
Gloss |
---|
PreSpace | false |
---|
t | postcoordinated expression |
---|
|
that specified a disease involving an
Concept |
---|
t | 56208002|ulcer| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
with
Concept |
---|
t | 363698007|finding site| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
Concept |
---|
t | 69695003|stomach structure| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
would be equivalent to or a
of
Concept |
---|
t | 397825006|gastric ulcer| |
---|
|
However, a query for all disorders involving
Concept |
---|
t | 78653002|gastric mucosa| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
would incorrectly exclude
Concept |
---|
t | 397825006|gastric ulcer| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
as the site is specified as
Concept |
---|
t | 78653002|gastric mucosa| |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
which is more specific than
Concept |
---|
t | 69695003|stomach structure|. |
---|
ShowFormat | inline |
---|
|
In reality there is another sufficient set defining relationships
Scg expression |
---|
397825006|gastric ulcer|
=== 116680003 |is a| = 64572001 |disease|
{ 116676008 |associated morphology| = 56208002 |ulcer| ,
363698007 |finding site| = 78653002|gastric mucosa| } |
but this is not currently represented in SNOMED CT. The reason for this is that currently the profile of description logic used by SNOMED CT does not support representation of multiple sufficient sets.
When multiple sufficient sets are supported, satisfying a single sufficient set enables an inference to be made that all necessary conditions must also be true. For example
However, as the current profile does not enable recognition of multiple sufficient sets, the general rule is to represent the most general sufficient set as this gives the greatest coverage for subsumption testing. This approach is taken because including more defining relationships, without distinguishing them from the sufficient set means some logically equivalent expressions will not compute as equivalent to or subsumed by the defined concept. This occurs in any cases where the expression does not include one of the attributes in the definition - even if it was not part of the logically sufficient set.