Search



Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

The appendix contains an extended version of  2.3.2 Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Definitions supported by more detailed examples.

Excerpt Include
2.3.2 Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Definitions
2.3.2 Necessary Conditions and Sufficient Definitions
nopaneltrue

A Definition that is Both Necessary and Sufficient

The definition shown in 

Caption reference
CapRefIdstated-view-procedures
CapRefTypeTable
 provides an example of a simple case.

  • The === symbol indicates that the concept definition is equivalent to the concept. 
    • This means that each of the assertions in the definition is necessarily true for all instance of the concept 
      Concept
      t710785000 |Laparoscopic repair of hernia|
      .
    • It also means that this definition is sufficient, because if all the assertions are true, this implies this is either the concept or a subtype of the concept.


Caption label
CapIdstated-view-procedures
CapTypeTable
Stated view of the definition of |Laparoscopic repair of hernia|
ConceptStated View of Concept Definition

Concept
t710785000 |Laparoscopic repair of hernia|

Scg expression
=== 71388002 |Procedure| :
            { 363700003 |Direct morphology| = 414402003 |Hernial opening (morphologic abnormality)|, 
              425391005 |Using access device| = 86174004 |Laparoscope, device|, 
              260686004 |Method| = 257903006 |Repair - action| }


The definition shown in 

Caption reference
CapRefIdstated-view-primitive
CapRefTypeTable
 provides an example of another common case.

  • The === symbol indicates that the concept definition is equivalent to the concept. 
    • This means that each of the assertions in the definition necessarily true for all instance of the concept 
      Concept
      t710785000 |Laparoscopic repair of hernia|
      .
    • It also means that this definition is sufficient, because if all the assertions are true, this implies this is either the concept or a subtype of the concept.

A Definition that is Necessary but Not Sufficient

The definition shown in 

Caption reference
CapRefIdstated-view-primitive
CapRefTypeTable
 provides an example of another simple case.

  • The <<< symbol indicates that the concept is a subtype of the concept definition. 
    • This means that each of the assertions in the definition is necessarily true for all instance of the concept 
      Concept
      t173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)|
      .
    • However, this definition is not sufficient, because it is represent a more general meaning. Put another way, it does not capture one or more distinguishing features or the
      Concept
      t173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)|
      . This means that even if all the assertions are true, it may or may not be this concept or one of its subtypes.


Caption label
CapIdstated-view-primitive
CapTypeTable
Stated view of the definition of |Acute benign pericarditis|
ConceptStated View of Concept Definition

Concept
t173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)|

Scg expression
<<< 64572001 |Disease| :
        263502005 |Clinical course| = 424124008 |Sudden onset AND/OR short duration|
            { 116676008 |Associated morphology | = 4532008 |Acute inflammation| , 
              363698007 |Finding site| = 24949005 |Pericardial sac structure| }


A Definition that is Sufficient with Assertions that are Not Necessarily True

Note

This example is illustrates a type of definition that was not supported prior to the enhancement to SNOMED CT support for advanced description logic. Therefore, the definition shown is for illustration only and will not be found in current releases of SNOMED.

The definition shown in 

Caption reference
CapRefIdstated-view-secondary-dm
CapRefTypeTable
 provides an example of a more complex case. 

  • The >>> symbol indicates that the concept definition represents a subtype of the concept definition. 
    • This means that each of the assertions in the definition is necessarily true for all instance of the concept 
      Concept
      t173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)|
      .
    • However, this definition is not sufficient, because it is represent a more general meaning. Put another way, it does not capture one or more distinguishing features or the 
      Concept
      t173574009 |Acute benign pericarditis (disorder)|
      . This means that even if all the assertions are true, it may or may not be this concept or one of its subtypes.


Caption label
CapIdstated-view-primitive
CapTypeTable
Possible stated view of the definition of |Secondary diabetes mellitus|
ConceptStated View of Concept Definition

Concept
t8801005 |Secondary diabetes mellitus (disorder)|

Scg expression
>>>73211009 |Diabetes mellitus|:
        246075003 |Causative agent| = 105590001 |Substance|
OR
>>>73211009 |Diabetes mellitus|: 
        42752001 |Due to| = 64572001 |Disease|

Sufficiently Defined

  1. Glossary include
    Glosssufficiently defined concept
    Suffix is
    Definline
    Exampletrue
    Notetrue
    Prefix A

    •  If a concept has a sufficient definition, it is possible to infer whether another concept or a 

      Gloss
      PreSpacefalse
      tpostcoordinated expression
       is a 
      Gloss
      PreSpacefalse
      tsubtype
       of, or equivalent to, that
      Gloss
      PreSpacefalse
      tconcept.


  2. Primitive

    Glossary include
    Glossprimitive concept
    Suffix is
    Definline
    Exampletrue
    Notetrue
    Prefix A

Necessary Conditions

All SNOMED CT defining relationships currently released are necessarily (always) true for the concept defined. Relationships that are necessarily true are also know as necessary conditions.

Glossary include
Glossnecessary condition
Suffix is defined as
Definline
Exampletrue
Prefix A

Sufficient Sets of Conditions

In practice there can be several sufficient definitions for a concept. That is to say several different ways in which a concept could be sufficiently defined by different sets of

Gloss
PreSpacefalse
tdefining relationships
For example:

Gastric ulcer is defined as follows:

Scg expression
397825006|gastric ulcer| 
===	 116680003 |is a| = 64572001 |disease| 
	    { 116676008 |associated morphology| = 56208002 |ulcer| , 
	    363698007 |finding site| =69695003 |stomach structure| }

This is a sufficient definition because any

Concept
t56208002|ulcer|
ShowFormatinline
in a
Concept
t69695003|stomach structure|
ShowFormatinline
is by definition a
Concept
t397825006|gastric ulcer|.
ShowFormatinline
Based on this definition:

Any

Gloss
PreSpacefalse
tpostcoordinated expression
that specified a disease involving an
Concept
t56208002|ulcer|
ShowFormatinline
with
Concept
t363698007|finding site|
ShowFormatinline
Concept
t69695003|stomach structure|
ShowFormatinline
would be equivalent to or a
Gloss
PreSpacefalse
tsubtype
of
Concept
t397825006|gastric ulcer|
 

However, a query for all disorders involving

Concept
t78653002|gastric mucosa|
ShowFormatinline
would incorrectly exclude
Concept
t397825006|gastric ulcer|
ShowFormatinline
as the site is specified as
Concept
t78653002|gastric mucosa|
ShowFormatinline
which is more specific than
Concept
t69695003|stomach structure|.
ShowFormatinline
In reality there is another sufficient set defining relationships

Scg expression
397825006|gastric ulcer| 
===	 116680003 |is a| = 64572001 |disease| 
	    { 116676008 |associated morphology| = 56208002 |ulcer| , 
	    363698007 |finding site| = 78653002|gastric mucosa| }

but this is not currently represented in SNOMED CT. The reason for this is that currently the profile of description logic used by SNOMED CT does not support representation of multiple sufficient sets. 

When multiple sufficient sets are supported, satisfying a single sufficient set enables an inference to be made that all necessary conditions must also be true. For example

  • The definition

    Concept
    t363698007|finding site|
    =
    Concept
    t78653002|gastric mucosa|
    ShowFormatinline
    is a necessary condition for
    Concept
    t397825006|gastric ulcer|
    :

    • This is true because all gastric ulcers necessarily involve the

      Concept
      t78653002|gastric mucosa|

  • The definition

    Concept
    t116676008|morphology|
    =
    Concept
    t56208002|ulcer|
    ShowFormatinline
    and
    Concept
    t363698007|finding site|
    =
    Concept
    t69695003|stomach structure|
    ShowFormatinline
    is a sufficient definition for
    Concept
    t397825006|gastric ulcer|
    :

    • This is true because any ulcer in a stomach structure is a

      Concept
      t397825006|gastric ulcer|

  • Therefore, an assertion that a person has an

    Concept
    t56208002|ulcer|
    ShowFormatinline
    with
    Concept
    t363698007|finding site|
    ShowFormatinline
    Concept
    t69695003|stomach|
    ShowFormatinline
    is sufficient to imply that they have a
    Concept
    t397825006|gastric ulcer|
    :

    • Since a gastric ulcer necessarily involves the

      Concept
      t78653002|gastric mucosa|
      ShowFormatinline
      it should be possible to deduce that a person with an "ulcer" with finding site
      Concept
      t69695003|stomach|
      ShowFormatinline
      has a disorder of with a site
      Concept
      t78653002|gastric mucosa|

However, as the current profile does not enable recognition of multiple sufficient sets, the general rule is to represent the most general sufficient set as this gives the greatest coverage for subsumption testing. This approach is taken because including more defining relationships, without distinguishing them from the sufficient set means some logically equivalent expressions will not compute as equivalent to or subsumed by the defined concept. This occurs in any cases where the expression does not include one of the attributes in the definition - even if it was not part of the logically sufficient set.