Descriptions:
Term | description type | Language/acceptability | Language/acceptability | Case significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Magnetic resonance imaging of [body structure] with [contrast] for [focus] | FSN | us:P | gb:P | ci |
MRI of [body structure] with [contrast] for [focus] | PT | us:P | gb:P | CS |
Magnetic resonance imaging of [body structure] with [contrast] for [focus] | SYN | us:A | gb:A | ci |
example: 702685007 |Magnetic resonance imaging of kidney with contrast (procedure)|
Concept model:
Attribute cardinality | Attribute cardinality in role group | Attribute | Value |
---|---|---|---|
1..1 | 0..0 | ||
0..1 | 0..1 | [focus] << 404684003 |Clinical finding (finding)| OR << 71388002 |Procedure (procedure)| | |
1..1 | 1..1 | ||
0..1 | [body structure] << 442083009 |Anatomical or acquired body structure (body structure)| | ||
0..1 | [contrast] << 385420005 |Contrast media (substance)| |
Definition status:
900000000000073002 |Defined (core metadata concept)|
Applies to:
<<
113091000 |Magnetic resonance imaging (procedure)|
MINUS (<<
258177008 |Magnetic resonance imaging guidance (procedure)|
OR <<
90084008 |Magnetic resonance imaging without contrast (procedure)|
OR <<
241671007 |Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (procedure)|
)
Template language:
[[~0..1]]{[[~0..1]] 363702006 |Has focus (attribute)| = [[+id(<< 404684003 |Clinical finding (finding)| OR << 71388002 |Procedure (procedure)| ) @focus]]},
[[~1..1]]{
[[~1..1]] 260686004 |Method (attribute)| = 312250003 |Magnetic resonance imaging - action (qualifier value)| ,
[[~0..1]] 405813007 |Procedure site - Direct (attribute)| = [[+id(<< 442083009 |Anatomical or acquired body structure (body structure)| ) @bodyStructure]],
[[~0..1]] 424361007 |Using substance (attribute)| = [[+id(<< 385420005 |Contrast media (substance)| ) @contrast]]
}
Link to the misaligned concept report:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O4qg-Lzf1SLe1mZNxVqkOVI7gVVwMaIMcCY7iAC3VCU/edit?pli=1#gid=0 (report from v.1.1)
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GsSYrjcvj2wYLCFfK_rE9TC5Qn9MvsIO1pZSeQEC0d4/edit#gid=0 ( report from v1.3)
docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FxLVJ17Skql8t9CziNGDn-Qx0hwvwdc3YCYFJY5VIqk/edit ( report v1.3 allows multiple role groups for multiple sites including bilateral)
Rules for description generation:
- Apply General rules for generating descriptions for templates;
- Apply Enhancements for the Template Language;
JIRA ticket:
- INFRA-6532Getting issue details... STATUS
7 Comments
Elaine Wooler
Hi Yongsheng Gao
Revised MRI template including optional contrast ready for you to review please. I've re-run the misaligned report based on the revised template and this has reduced from 384 to 202.
Many thanks
Elaine
Yongsheng Gao
Hi Elaine Wooler, I have made further changes to refine the template and the version 1.3 includes
1. Changed to the new format for columns of cardinalities.
2. Restricted the domain to exclude MRI without contrast, MRI guided procedures, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
3. Added an optional 'has focus' to support a small number of MRI imaging with focus.
The report for v1.3 has reduced the number of misalignment concepts to 122. With the relax of attribute cardinality, there are only 13 misaligned concepts. Please review both reports. For example, 448541001 |Magnetic resonance imaging angiography of mesenteric artery (procedure)| is not aligned in the v1.3 report. However, it is aligned with the template if we relax the attribute cardinality.
Elaine Wooler
Hi Yongsheng Gao
Great, thank you. Will review the reports.
Peter G. Williams
Hi Elaine Wooler Can I check where we are now with this template please? Yong's comment above (point 2) said to exclude MRI with contrast and I'm not sure why he'd say that since the optional "Using Substance" attribute looks like it allows for inclusion of the 'with contrast' concepts. So there's that, but then the exclusion provided is removing 'without contrast' and again the optional nature of that attribute makes it seem (to me) that we don't need to exclude either with OR without contrast?
Elaine Wooler
Hi Peter G. Williams Yes "with contrast" is included. But "without contrast" was excluded because they have to be modelled with the primitive parent 719259006 |Imaging procedure without contrast (procedure)| and we can't model "without"
Peter G. Williams
Thanks Elaine Wooler, that makes sense.
Elaine Wooler
Hi Yongsheng Gao
I think this is ready to go in to production.
Thanks
Elaine