Summary

This item has been set up to support CMAG discussion on number of countries that should support inclusion of specific content before that content is deemed acceptable in the International Edition. While at present the two or more countries principle exists, this needs discussion. This topic will support the progression of work plan items 4 and 5: CMAG 2019 Work Plan

Considerations (to be expanded):

• Management of content in the international edition and national extensions
  • Maintenance of the terminology edition/extension, 
  • Managing exclusion of content not suitable for a specific national or local extension.
• Areas of content which should be the focus.
  • Administrative content, statuses, some occupations?
  • A disorder or procedure would usually be considered internationally relevant.
• The need for internationally agreed meanings and definitions
• Translation

Please complete the table below. Note due date must be a minimum of three weeks after group has provided with the relevant explanation and materials.

Relevant documents

Actions

• Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date

Links

Links to relevant meeting minutes, discussions and confluence sites e.g. discussions by other groups, project pages etc

Country response 

Table to be completed by each CMAG member for their country. Please note as per the TOR responsibilities consideration needs to be given to Member countries who are not represented on this group to ensure that their priorities are reflected in the group discussions. Where a second round of review occurs, this table may be duplicated.

CMAG response

The CMAG response(s) which are to be fed back to the relevant group or person e.g. Editorial Advisory Group.

Final outcome: 

Date: 

The action taken by the IHTSDO, Advisory Group or other as relevant. This may be a written summary or link to the relevant Confluence page.