Please change the header to the name of the topic or issue for discussion

Summary

A review of the planned update to the CMAG Terms of Reference

 


Actions: 

DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
 15 November 17 Review of the update to the CMAG TOR.
  • Camilla Wiberg Danielsen  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Daniel Karlsson  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Elaine Wooler  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Elze de Groot   Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • John Fountain   Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Linda Parisien   Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Matt Cordell  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Olivier Bodenreider  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Jostein Ven  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
  • Johannes Gnaegi  Please review the attached draft update of the CMAG TOR and provide comments as required.
Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.


Relevant documents

Links

2017-11-14 - CMAG Meeting

Country response 

Table to be completed by each CMAG member for their country. Please note as per the TOR responsibilities consideration needs to be given to Member countries who are not represented on this group to ensure that their priorities are reflected in the group discussions. Where a second round of review occurs, this table may be duplicated.

CountryDateResponse
 CA 8Dec2017 I'm not sure the following item should be part into the scope of our AG, because since we have this in our TOR, we never discussed it or provided assistance :
  • Assist IHTSDO in the identification of relevant organizations or individuals for Technology Previews of forthcoming SNOMED CT content and/or derivative enhancements.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Member countries without a CMAG rep  

 

CMAG response

The CMAG response(s) which are to be fed back to the relevant group or person e.g. Editorial Advisory Group.

DateCMAG ResponseNext steps
   
   
   

 

Final outcome: 

Date: 

The action taken by the IHTSDO, Advisory Group or other as relevant. This may be a written summary or link to the relevant Confluence page.