Date: 2018-09-19

1600 - 1730 UTC

0900-1030 PDT

1200-1330 EDT

1300-1430 Argentina time

Zoom Meeting Details

SNOMED Int'l Editorial Advisory group

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone:

Topic: SNOMED Editorial Advisory Group - April face-to-face Part 1

Time: Apr 10, 2018 9:00 AM London

https://snomed.zoom.us/j/919465676

Attendees

Chair:

Jim Case

AG Members

Observers:

Apologies

Meeting Files

Meeting recording

The folder containing the meeting recordings is located here.

Objectives

Obtain consensus on agenda items

Discussion items

Item	Description	Owner	Notes
1	Call to order and role call	JCA
2	Conflicts of interest Notice of recording	JCA	GRE - Contractor to SI, Principal in TermMed
	Approval of minutes from April business meeting	JCA	Edited transcripts of the discussion regarding the "Naked kernel" and the next generation of SNOMED are available here.
	ECE Update	BGO
	Allergy and Intolerance update	BGO
	Observables project group update	DKA	Issues from the vital signs modelling
	Strict hierarchy paper	KCA	Discuss this paper in light of the new drug model. Specifically how the new model resolves many of the issues with incorrect inferences related to the IS A hierarchy in substances. Smashing the strict hierarchy
	Update from TermMed: Naked kernel constructs	GRE	Batch editing of the disorder/findings hierarchy to transform it into a representation with a "naked kernel" clinical entities hierarchy (no soft defaults) Additional auxiliary hierarchies supporting better modeling patterns An observation/statement/assertion/phenomena hierarchy that would explicitly represent context (e.g. presence/absence) while supporting correct aggregation of some absence patterns.
	Historical association refset	JRO	Revisit the intended meaning and operational consequences of the nine subflavours of 900000000000522004\|Historical association reference set (foundation metadata concept)\| ‘historical associations’ are to be declared between inactive concepts and their candidate active (and so taxonomically reportable) substitute(s). Sections within the RefSets Practical and Terminology Services guide mention that such associations exist - though they’re rather silent on what you can or should do with them. No obviously visible guidance (e.g. in the new Editorial Guide) on how and why authors should decide what makes a ‘good association’ Not a lot of understanding of the possible consequences of a bad or missing one.
	Sources of truth	BGO
	Agenda planning for Vancouver	JCA, EAG
	Future meetings	JCA

Page tree

2018-09-19 Editorial Advisory Group Conference Call