Page tree

Loading...

Date/Time 

20:00 UTC on Tuesday 13 March 2018 - 90 minutes.

Objectives

  • Bindings to FHIR Clinical Resources (e.g. value set bindings)

Discussion items

Item
Description

Mins

Owner
Notes & Actions
1Welcome and introductions5

Recording + Notes.

2

Summary of previous week


5
3Profile for Specimen Resouce65

Specimen binding

Suggestion from Jim Case that the type attribute would be better bound to (< Substance plus < Morphologic Abnormality plus < Physical Object (or selection thereof)) rather than Specimen as it avoids any potential conflict with the other attributes and is effectively opening up post coordination, rather than sticking to a inherently restricted set of pre-coordinated concepts.

Similarly (Linda Bird), the method attribute is currently a selection of SNOMED CT concepts plus a V2 valueset.

Two main options:

  1. Use Specimen hierarchy for "type" and then constrain what can appear in the other fields (and how we deal with conflict!)
  2. Put all information into a post coordinated expression in the "type" attribute (Jim Case noted that some aspects - like the shipping container - may not be characteristics intrinsic to the specimen).

Jim Case also suggested that using these decomposed fields would only be used outside of a SNOMED context. Otherwise could be achieved - (PWI: more safely due to MRCM) - with post coordinated.

4ValueSets10

How do we produce and publish ValueSets?

  • Tools?
5Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets.

Molecular Pathology harmonising V2 and FHIR Datasets

6Next TB meeting5



27 March 2018


 

Meeting Files

  File Modified
Text File meeting_saved_chat.txt 2018-Mar-09 by Peter G. Williams


 

Previous Meetings

TitleCreatorModified
No content found.