You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version .
Compare with Current
View Page History
« Previous
Version 5
Next »
Summary CMAG review of the 2017 Self evaluation
Actions Date Requested action Requester(s) Response required by: Comments 15 November 2017 Review of the 2017 CMAG self evaluation document Camilla Wiberg Danielsen 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required.Daniel Karlsson 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Elaine Wooler 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Elze de Groot 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. John Fountain 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Linda Parisien 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Matt Cordell 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Olivier Bodenreider 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Jostein Ven 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Johannes Gnaegi 05 Dec 2017 Please review the attached draft of the CMAG self evaluation for 2017 and provide comments as required. Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.
Relevant documents
No files shared here yet.
Links 2017-11-14 - CMAG Meeting
Country response
Country Date Response U.S. 15OCT2017 Esstially OK. Here are a few suggestions.
To substantiate out contribution, would recommend to list (at least some of) the projects and topics on which CMAG has provided national perspective. Would also mention the venues to which the extension analysis has been reported (business meetings in April 2017, poster at the Expo in October 2017). Finally, would point out that several new menmbers have joined in 2017, providing a broader perspective from member countries, while remaining agile and engaged. Member countries without a CMAG rep
CMAG response
Date CMAG Response Next steps
Final outcome: Date: