Inactivation Reason | Association | Definition |
---|---|---|
Outdated | REPLACED_BY POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY No suitable replacement identified | The inactivation reason “Outdated Concept” explicitly states that the inactivated concept (A) is an outdated concept that is no longer considered to be clinically acceptable or semantically interoperable internationally. It is possible that the original meaning of the outdated concept could be “REPLACED_BY” concept (B) that is semantically similar to or more general than the inactivated concept for the purposes of data healing and analysis of historical data. However, in some circumstances, there will be no suitable replacement concept and therefore no historical association is provided. |
Guidance | ||
|
Examples
Outdated concept:
58337008 | Transorbital leukotomy (procedure)|
REPLACED_BY:
- No suitable replacement concept identified
- Also known as “Ice pick lobotomy”, as this was the instrument used in the procedure, last performed by Dr. Freeman in 1967.
Managing Incoming Historical Associations
The intention is that this functionality will be seamlessly integrated into the tooling so as to present to the user the appropriate updated historically association to be allocated.
Whenever an already stated “REPLACED_BY” target itself also becomes inactive - whether at the same release or later, identifying the replacement for the original concept, should follow the combinatorial logic stated below.
(A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) SAME_AS (C) implies (A) REPLACED_BY (C)
(A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) REPLACED_BY (C) implies (A) REPLACED_BY (C)
(AIntEd) REPLACED_BY (BIntEd) and (BIntEd) MOVED_TO (CNRC) implies (AIntEd) MOVED_TO (CNRC)
(A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO (C, D) implies (A) POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO (C, D)
(A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) WAS_A (C AND D) implies (A) WAS_A (C AND D)
Whenever an already stated “POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY” target itself also becomes inactive - whether at the same release or later, identifying the replacement for the original concept, should follow the combinatorial logic stated below.
(A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) SAME_AS (D) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D)
(A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) REPLACED_BY (D) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D)
(AIntEd) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (BIntEd OR CIntEd) and (BIntEd) MOVED_TO (DNRC) implies (AIntEd) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (CIntEd)
(A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (D OR E) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D OR E)
(A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO (D OR E) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D OR E)
(A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) WAS_A (D AND E) implies ((A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C) OR (A) WAS_A (D AND E))
Note: Once MOVED_TO the NRC, SNOMED International have no knowledge of what has happened to BIntEd