Date: 2020-10-06

Time:

1600- 1800 UTC

0900-1100 PDT

Zoom Meeting Details

Topic: SNOMED Editorial Advisory Group Conference Call

Time: Oct 6, 2020 09:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada)

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android:
https://snomed.zoom.us/j/95743299814?pwd=OVRKM1h4TG1SZzVaaE90WkZ1bTc5Zz09
Password: 278629

Meeting ID: 957 4329 9814

    Password: 278629
    International numbers available: https://snomed.zoom.us/u/apmtg2lWH

Or Skype for Business (Lync):
    https://snomed.zoom.us/skype/95743299814

Attendees

Chair:

Jim Case

AG Members

Invitees:

Observers:

Apologies:

Meeting Files:

Meeting minutes:

The call recording is located here.

Objectives

Obtain consensus on agenda items

Discussion items

Item	Description	Owner	Notes	Action
1	Call to order and role call	Jim Case	Start recording!
2	Conflicts of interest and agenda review Welcome to new EAG members	Jim Case	No conflicts noted SNOMED welcomes new EAG members Alejandro Lopez Osornio, Monique van Berkum and James R. Campbell We appreciate the service of Guillermo Reynosoover the past six years and look forward to continuing interaction through the MAG. Bruce Goldbergremains on the EAG as an ex officio member due to his leadership on the Event, Condition, Episode working group.
	Update: Spinal cord injuries vs. spinal cord syndromes	Jim Case	Discussion: Based on the recommendation from the EAG, the impacted concepts have been remodeled and promoted to the terminology server MAIN branch.	Jim Case Implement modeling decision regarding assignment of syndromes to lesions. Remove Incomplete cord syndrome relationships where not specifically stated.
	Update: Pathological fracture	Jim Case	Analysis of questions from last call following model testing: Questions: Should we consider ALL fractures as traumatic (e.g. pathological fractures are minor trauma to weakened bone)? [NOTE: This has been the historical representation in SNOMED CT] Can we infer that all non-traumatic fractures are pathological fractures (i.e. requires some predisposing bone pathology)? If the distinction between traumatic and pathological fractures needs to be made, how do we interpret the meaning of “Fracture of X”? Do we need specific “Traumatic fracture of X” concepts?
	ECE Topics	Bruce Goldberg Jim Case	Pathologic fractures Questions: Should we consider ALL fractures as traumatic (e.g. pathological fractures are minor trauma to weakened bone)? [NOTE: This has been the historical representation in SNOMED CT] Can we infer that all non-traumatic fractures are pathological fractures (i.e. requires some predisposing bone pathology)? If the distinction between traumatic and pathological fractures needs to be made, how do we interpret the meaning of “Fracture of X”? Do we need specific “Traumatic fracture of X” concepts? Discussion:	Pathological fractures.pptx Jim Case to implement modeling of Pathological fractures as traumatic fractures Jim Case to re-evaluate the use of PATHOLOGICAL PROCESS for modeling underlying processes for Pathological processes and subtypes
	Next meeting	EAG	Discussion:

Page tree

2020-10-06 Editorial Advisory Group Conference call