In healthcare, there are many words with equivalent meanings. Synonyms provide alternative
phrases referring to the Concept. However, Synonyms are not created automatically
for every possible combination of words with an equivalent meaning. The success of
simple searches using one or more keywords depends on the text of the available Descriptions.
Therefore searches will fail or will be incomplete where a different but equivalent
word is used in the search.
SNOMED CT cannot and does not attempt to enumerate all possible synonyms for all Concepts. Neither to enumerate all possible semantically equivalent typographic,
part-of-speech or ordering variations of the synonyms it does include. To do so, especially
automatically, would both require a considerable lexical resource and hugely increase
the number of Descriptions and the size of any associated index tables. An alternative
technical architecture involves a selective, logical expansion of search expressions
and the relevant fragment of Description-space at run-time, using substantially the
same lexical resources
For example: | Kidney stone | and | Renal calculus | are synonymous Descriptions in SNOMED CT. However, a search of SNOMED CT for the
target phrase "kidney stone fragmentation" yields the result | Percutaneous nephrostomy with fragmentation of kidney stone | while a search for "Renal stone fragmentation" yields no results. One way of addressing
this problem is to maintain a table of word equivalents, and a table of this type is a prerequisite for exhaustive synonym generation. The Word
Equivalent Table is included in the Developer Toolkit of SNOMED CT. [see SNOMED CT Developer Toolkit Guide]. Individual implementers will wish to add additional word equivalents to meet the requirements of their particular medical specialty or user needs. The
resulting table then acts as an additional resource to assist searching and parsing
of phrases. It need not be a comprehensive dictionary of words.
Example:
"Tap" and "aspiration" are equivalent in the context of terms such as "pleural tap", "pleural aspiration", but not in the context of a "patella
tap", a physical "tap" on a bag or catheter, or the clinical disorder "neonatal aspiration
syndrome".
When searching using incomplete words and/or wildcards, use of word equivalents may impede effective searches by increasing the number of spurious potential matches.
This either extends the processing required to filter the real matches from the potential
matches or increases the length of the list of choices presented to the user.
Example: Using word equivalents table to extend a failed search
A system user enters the search string "Fragmentation of renal calculus;" the search returns no results. The search application
that the user has been provided with has the option to extend the search by using
the word equivalents table.
Table 1:Word Equivalents Table Example
Step 1:
The user selects this option (or it is invoked automatically because the initial search
without word equivalents found nothing) and searches again using the same search string. The table is used to make substitutions in the search string to produce all possible unique search variants:
"Fragmentation of renal calculus"
"Fragmentation of renal stone"
"Fragmentation of kidney stone"
"Fragmentation of kidney calculus"
"Fragmentation of Nephrolith"
"Fragmentation of renal calculus"
"Fragmentation of renal calculi"
"Fragmentation of kidney calculi"
These 8 search variants are used as the target phrases for the searches. The search
results of these variants are combined, duplicate Concepts are eliminated and the
list of search results is returned.
Step 2:
Figure 12Extending searches with word equivalents
Feedback
Overview
Content Tools
Apps