Page tree

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

SNOMED International is seeking input on the use by members of the international occupation content. A list of international content: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XvnAYkCOSbuh0tTFtss4odeGCv3utVkVcq0D27hRhbQ/edit?usp=sharing

To determine the international applicability of this content would you please comment in the spreadsheet:
• Which of these occupations are relevant within your country?
• Are the concepts that are relevant in your country currently be used?

Would you also advise if this content be useful if a “base” concept was present? For example, draughts-person. Comments can be made below.

Please advise if you will require additional time to complete this. Due date is 24 July 2021. 

Thank you for your input. 


Relevant documents

No files shared here yet.


Actions

DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
17 June 2021Please see instructions above.
Please post your comments as requested above. Discussion comments can be made as comments.

Links

Country response 

CountryDateResponse
DenmarkJune 18th 2021We have not translated all occupation concepts and to my knowledge they are not in use in Denmark.
US20200706

No evidence of use of any of the occupation codes in value sets from VSAC, which makes it difficult to comment on relevance for the US.

This said, a few value sets use occupation codes (e.g., Care Team Member Function), but none of the codes from this particular list are. 

The list above is some kind of a subset and it is not entirely clear where it comes from.

Is is one for real?

159725002Batman

One more thought: Wondering whether we should align SNOMED CT to other existing standards in this domain, e.g., International Standard Classification of Occupations from the International Labour Organization.

Sweden20210708As far as we know the occupations in the list are not used in Sweden. 
Canada20210720

We do publish a Healthcare provider subset which is a subset of occupations. From that perspective, we know that occupations in healthcare are often specific to jurisdictions. CIHI is often used for their healthcare resources. For non-healthcare occupations, we refer to the National Occupational Classification published by Government of Canada that provides the "generic" occupations that are available in Canada: https://noc.esdc.gc.ca/

The list provided seems to include outdated content (milkman) or too specific occupations ( X draughtsman ). It would be worthed to clean it.

















Member countries without a CMAG rep


CMAG response

DateCMAG ResponseNext steps










Final outcome: 

Date: 


  • No labels