...
Upon CMAG group approval the agreed version will be converted to a word document and provided to Don Sweete and the IHTSDO Management Board. Post Management Board approval the finalised version will be uploaded to this site and to the IHTSDO website.
Actions:
| Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 July 16 | Review and comment on CMAG ToR |
| Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. | |
July 2016 Proposed Terms of Reference for Content Managers Advisory Group
...
- Provision of input into the prioritization of items on the Content projects tracker.
- Provision of input as requested into the development of processes and guidance to support initiatives to augment IHTSDO’s content development capacity.
- Creation of task and finish subgroups to support progression of identified work items.
Provision of terminological and/or stakeholder input and feedback as requested on SNOMED CT content development projects and SNOMED CT derivative development projects.
Assist IHTSDO in the identification of relevant organizations or individuals for Technology Previews of forthcoming SNOMED CT content and/or derivative enhancements.
Not in scope
- SNOMED CT Editorial Policy (included in the scope for the SNOMED CT Editorial Advisory Group)
- Tooling for SNOMED CT content development and release
...
- Creation of a documented work plan for the group that is reviewed and updated yearly.
- Evidence of the provision of timely input and feedback on identified work items, content development projects and activities.
- Evidence of input being sought on identified work items and content development projects from Member Countries without a Content Managers Advisory Group representative.
- Evidence of efforts to increase authoring capacity and knowledge within NRC’s.
...
...
- Evidence of the progression of work by subgroups.
Relevant documents
| Attachments |
|---|
...
Notes: V1.01 is what the current approved version located on the IHTSDO website. The ToR on the CMAG site had been updated after this and was noted as draft on the CMAG site. The comparison provided is between the draft on the CMAG site and the new proposed version. V1.03 is the word version of what is presented here.
Actions
- Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Review of updated CMAG ToR
- Daniel Karlsson Review of updated CMAG ToR
- Elaine Wooler Review of updated CMAG ToR
- Elze de Groot Review of updated CMAG ToR
- John Fountain Review of updated CMAG ToR
- Linda Parisien Review of updated CMAG ToR
- Matt Cordell Review of updated CMAG ToR
- Olivier Bodenreider Review of updated CMAG ToR
...
Links
2016-07-12 - CMAG Meeting - topic discussed at this meeting.
Country response
| Country | Date | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UK |
| ||||
| Happy with overall document just a couple of comments below regarding additions to the TOR. | |||||
| NZ | Happy with the ToR as it stands, assuming that it is a living document and can be modified to suit future circumstances | ||||
| DK | Aug 8 2016 | Happy with the ToR including Lindas suggestions. | |||
Final outcome:
Date: 9 August 2016:
ToR update approved by CMAG at monthly meeting. Document to be sent for MB sign off.