In line with the proposed updates to the CMAG ToR ( CMAG ToR proposed update_July 2016 ) this is a proposed update to the CMAG workplan for the remainder of the "Advisory Group" year. The Advisory Manual notes these run from 1 October to 30th September.
Please note it is anticipated that given timing of the update the success criteria may not be fully completed and will be carried over to some extent to 2017 work plan however we criteria have been scaled back . More extensive criteria will be set for 2017. We will look to take significant steps to progress these items the set criteria to demonstrate the success of this group e.g. the sub group to develop Content Tracker prioritisation criteria.
Actions:
| Date | Requested Action | Requester(s) | Action required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 July 16 | Feedback on proposed changes to the CMAG 2016 Workplan |
|
| Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. | ||||
|
Proposed update to the CMAG 2016 Work Plan
...
The key measures of success in this area will be:
- Development Initial work towards the development of criteria to support the prioritization of the issues on the IHTSDO Content Tracker.
- Evidence of the timely provision of advice and feedback on content topics and issues that are presented to the Group for the purposes of seeking input.
- Active contribution to the development of a process that supports the implementation of Distributed Editing.
| Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Actions:
...
...
- Camilla Wiberg Danielsen 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- Daniel Karlsson 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- Elaine Wooler 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- Elze de Groot 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- John Fountain 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- Linda Parisien 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- Matt Cordell 2016 Work plan changes feedback
- Olivier Bodenreider 2016 Work plan changes feedback
...
Note: Given the update of this work plan in July- August 2016, the criteria required for measuring success have been set taking into account the remaining time available for carrying out this work plan. More substantial criteria will be set for 2017.
| Attachments | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Links
2016-07-12 - CMAG Meeting - topic discussed at this meeting.
Country response
| Country | Date | Response |
|---|---|---|
| UK |
| Regarding distributed editing perhaps all we can achieve before the end of September is an initial discussion on how we might want to contribute to this. |
Is that then still considered an “active contribution” perhaps yes? The TOR states the critical success factors will be measured annually so any specific work item listed under criteria for measuring success for 2016 should probably be related to the TOR critical success factors. I think for 2016 though there needs to be a caveat that progress towards the TOR critical success factors so far has been a lot to do organisational development of the AG and how we work and initial exploration of the issues at hand. |