Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • From now until June 10th:
    • Brainstorm what aspects to be considered e.g. atomic concept, context when identifying what content should be actively maintained? 
      • Members are asked to post their thoughts, ideas and questions in the discussion forum: to be set up  
    • Start to identify which hierarchies or sub-hierarchies should be actively maintained (even if not all the content in that hierarchy or sub-hierarchy should be actively maintained) 
  • June to August:
    • Review and discussion of the
      • aspects to consider
      • hierarchies (and sub hierarchies) for inclusion in the Clinical Core.
  • September: 
    • Development of a response to SNOMED International

...

EAG April meeting: 2019-04-08, 2019-04-09 Editorial Advisory Group Face-to-face Meeting


Attachments

 

Actions


DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments

24 May 2019

(as per email)

See work plan above
  •  Type your task here, using "@" to assign to a user and "//" to select a due date
  •  Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Daniel Karlsson Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Sheree Hemingway Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Elze de Groot Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Karina Revirol Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Linda Parisien Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Matt Cordell Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Olivier Bodenreider Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Jostein Ven Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  
  •  Theresa Barry Clinical Core Proposal - hierarchies and aspects work  


 

CMAG response