Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

 

Agenda and Minutes EAG 2/17/2017

Date  20170330

1700-1900 UTC 

GoToMeeting Details

SNOMED Int'l Editorial Advisory group  

SNOMED International - Editorial advisory group conference call  
Thu, Mar 30, 2017 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM PDT  

Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.  
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/465895349  

You can also dial in using your phone.  
United States: +1 (224) 501-3318  

Access Code: 465-895-349  

More phone numbers  
Australia: +61 2 8355 1038  
Belgium: +32 28 93 7002  
Canada: +1 (647) 497-9373  
Denmark: +45 32 72 03 69  
Netherlands: +31 707 709 520  
New Zealand: +64 9 913 2226  
Spain: +34 932 75 1230  
Sweden: +46 775 757 471  
United Kingdom: +44 20 3713 5011  

First GoToMeeting? Try a test session: http://help.citrix.com/getready 

Meeting Files

View file
name2017-03-30-EAG-Update.pptx
height250
 

Meeting minutes

Objectives

  • Obtain consensus on agenda items

Discussion items

ItemDescriptionOwnerNotesAction
1Call to order and role callJCA

 

 

2Conflicts of interestJCANone. 
3Approval of minutes from 02/17/2017JCA

EAG Agenda and Minutes 2/17/2017

The history of allergy modeling was very helpful. Encourage everyone to read for a final discussion in London, especially around the impacts of substance changes to the allergy model.

GRE - RG0 discussion will need additional attention in London. Recommend a review and revision of the original presentation for the London meeting.

 

4Drug Model deliverable reviewTMO

Drug Model Editorial Guide

Need resolution of roles in products. Depends on what extensions are allowed to model. Agenda topic for London.

Not in scope for July release - concept model for dose forms and how to reconcile different models for dose forms. Feedback needed.

How are routes of administration used in national extensions? Minimal additions to national drug model needed.

  •  GRE to develop specific issues needing resolution related to roles and extensibiity in national extensions.
5Substance redesign document reviewJCA/TMO

Substance hierarchy redesign

Substance disposition proposal (see attached document)

 

6Addition of "X disorder at Y level"JCA

ICD-11 beta includes a large number of mostly injury concepts that specify the particular "level" or "segment" that an anatomical structure is affected. There is historical precedence for adding this type of content as some was orginally derived from ICD-9 and has been in SNOMED since before 2002.

 

 
7ECE UpdateBGO 
8Extension of range of "Specimen substance"JCA

Followup: Upon the review of the use cases for the need for "Physical objects" to be values for "Specimen substance". The existence of "Device specimen" implies that physical objects in almost all cases provide the source for specimens that are actually analyzed. These would be specimens such as "swabs", "washings", "wipes". The physical objects themselves are usually not regarded as the matrix for analysis.

It is recommended that this proposal (Extend "Specimen substance" range) be modified to request the extension of "SPECIMEN SOURCE IDENTITY" up one level from "Device" to "Physical object".

  •   Jim Case to request update to MRCM rules to allow for the use of <Physical objects as range for SPECIMEN SOURCE IDENTITY attribute
9Proposed policy on acceptance of "Patient-friendly terms" into the International releaseJCA

There have been multiple requests from members to consider the addition of "Patient-friendly vocabulary". A draft position document discussing the pros and cons and a proposed policy for inclusion of such terms in the International release is provided for discussion and input.

View file
nameSNOMEDInternationalPositionontheadditionofPFTs.docx.docx
height250

  •   Jim Case to publish position document on patient friendly terms to confluence
10Proposed policy: Allowance of Extensions to Modify Core ContentJCA

A discussion document submitted to the Content Managers Advisory Group requested clarification on what national extensions were allowed to do re: modification of core content. The following draft document addresses the primary issues and proposes a more set of policy statements related to what is allowable and not allowable by extensions, which affect core content.

SNOMED International response to "Discussion paper - Allowance of Extensions to Modify Core Content"

 
11Agenda items for London meetingGroup