Cancer Synoptic Reporting Project Group

Space shortcuts

Page tree

Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Scott Campbell

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Scott Campbell

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Date

2018-03-20

GoToMeeting Details

Attendees

Apologies

Objectives

Discussion items

ItemDescriptionOwnerNotesAction
1Conflicts of Interest

Scott Campbell

  • None to declare
  •  
2 London agenda

 Scott Campbell

 Proposed Agenda:

Technical Day with Observables (Monday, PM):

  1. Inception and elaboration document review and adoptions
  2. Modeling questions
  3. Inter-dependence of Observables works and CSRPG needs/work
  4. Schedule review (project plan)

Pathologist Day (Tuesday, PM)

  1. Review of new worksheets
    1. Lung
    2. Melanoma
    3. CDA discussion/interop example
  2. Review content of next worksheets
    1. Pancreas
    2. Stomach
    3. Others?
  3. Data use examples and propagation plans
    1. US
    2. UK
    3. Australia
    4. Europe
  4. Outcome studies - who can/wants to collaborate?
    1. CRC with RCPath/UK; Duke?; Canada?; CAP?
    2. Discuss proposals?
    3. Suitable for academic publication AND promotion within domain circles of interest
 
3CDA architecture document

James R. Campbell

James R. Campbell reviewing and creating CDA architecture in alignment with IHE approach (APSR). JRC is creating example case for review in London.

Deborah Drake suggests how CDA interacts with FHIR. James R. Campbell should contact J. Kola to discuss profiles suggested for synoptic data

James R. Campbell can present to IHE at April meeting. Raj Dash to forward contacts to JRC for coordination.

4Publication of LOINC codes with SNOMED CT codes

James R. Campbell

Not discussed. Ian not present
5Linkages with other CRG's

Deborah Drake



6Coordination with Colleges of Path/International organization

Scott Campbell;

Andrea MacLean

Andrea reviewed Infoway synoptic discussion/conference. 50 people on the call from each provinces, CAP, pathology, IT. SNOMED CT for question and answer vs. LOINC. Early to say for NAACCR and transition from C-keys to SNOMED CT.

Andrea and Sam Spencer to share their NAACCR contact info to begin broaching the topic of adoption of SNOMED CT for NAACCR registry consumption....long term.


7Use case/vendor advice for implementation

Scott Campbell; Raj DashJames R. Campbell

Generate vendor advice as a work product


Meeting Files

Attachments

 

Previous Meetings

Content Report Table
maxResults12
showCommentsCounttrue
spaces@self
labelsmeeting-agenda