Inactivation Reason | Association | Definition |
---|---|---|
Outdated | REPLACED_BY POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY No suitable replacement identified | The inactivation reason “Outdated Concept” explicitly states that the inactivated concept (A) is an outdated concept that is no longer considered to be clinically acceptable or semantically interoperable internationally. It is possible that the original meaning of the outdated concept could be “REPLACED_BY” concept (B) that is semantically similar to or more general than the inactivated concept for the purposes of data healing and analysis of historical data. However, in some circumstances, there will be no suitable replacement concept and therefore no historical association is provided. |
Guidance | ||
|
Examples
Panel | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Outdated concept:
|
Panel | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Outdated concept:
|
Resolving sequences of Historical Associations
The intention is that functionality to resolve sequences of Historical Associations will normally
...
Outdated Concept
...
REPLACED_BY association reference set (foundation metadata concept)
POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY association reference set (foundation metadata concept)
Additional notes:
Examples:
Semantic meaning the same but FSN different:
235998001 Perinephric abscess (disorder) - inactivated
SAME_AS
80640009 Perirenal abscess (disorder)
Both concepts had an effective date of 2002-01-31 and so the decision was based on current clinical usage and the retained concept already had a synonym of Perinephric abscess.
Identical FSN but different semantic tag:
145857006 Soft tissue X-ray abnormal (situation) - inactivated
SAME_AS
168711005 Soft tissue X-ray abnormal (finding)
Managing incoming historical associations:
...
be seamlessly integrated into the tooling so as to present to the user the appropriate updated historically association to be allocated.
Whenever an already stated “REPLACED_BY” target itself also becomes inactive - whether at the same release or later, identifying the replacement for the original concept, should follow the combinatorial logic stated below.
Combinatorial Logic - REPLACED_BY |
---|
(A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) SAME_AS (C) implies (A) REPLACED_BY (C) (A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) REPLACED_BY (C) implies (A) REPLACED_BY (C) (AIntEd) REPLACED_BY (BIntEd) and (BIntEd) MOVED_TO (CNRC) implies (AIntEd) MOVED_TO (CNRC) (A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO (C, D) implies (A) POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO (C, D) (A) REPLACED_BY (B) and (B) WAS_A (C AND D) implies (A) WAS_A (C AND D) |
Whenever an already stated “POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY” target itself also becomes inactive - whether at the same release or later, identifying the replacement for the original concept, should follow the combinatorial logic stated below.
Combinatorial Logic - POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY |
---|
(A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) SAME_AS (D) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D) (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) REPLACED_BY (D) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D) (AIntEd) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (BIntEd OR CIntEd) and (BIntEd) MOVED_TO (DNRC) implies (AIntEd) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (CIntEd) (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (D OR E) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D OR E) (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) POSSIBLY_EQUIVALENT_TO (D OR E) implies (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C OR D OR E) (A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (B OR C) and (B) WAS_A (D AND E) implies ((A) POSSIBLY_REPLACED_BY (C) OR (A) WAS_A (D AND E)) |
Note: Once MOVED_TO the NRC we (, SNOMED International ) have no knowledge of what has happened to BIntEdBIntEd