Content Managers Advisory Group

Page tree

Versions Compared

Old Version 15

changes.mady.by.user Daniel Karlsson

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Daniel Karlsson

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

CountryDateResponse
 U.S. 15OCT2017

 Esstially OK. Here are a few suggestions.

  • To substantiate out contribution, would recommend to list (at least some of) the projects and topics on which CMAG has provided national perspective.
  • Would also mention the venues to which the extension analysis has been reported (business meetings in April 2017, poster at the Expo in October 2017).
  • Finally, would point out that several new menmbers have joined in 2017, providing a broader perspective from member countries, while remaining agile and engaged.
 NZ 5Dec17 OK by me
 CA8Dec2017 It looks good
 UK 8DEC17 Looks good though agree with Olivier's suggestions for some additional information.
 SE 8DEC17 Agreeing Agreeing in principle with Olivier, but I'm not sure of the function of this document. If it's a box-ticking exercise, everything in the table is true and we've done some good work, and it is fine as is. If it's to be distributed more widely then more details, thourgh through links etc., could be provided.
   
   
   
Member countries without a CMAG rep  

...