...
| Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 March 2017 |
Note: Monica to provide a briefing note. |
| Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments. |
...
| Country | Date | Response | |
|---|---|---|---|
| US | 18MAR2017 | This proposal seems beneficial to SNOMED, because 1) it derives from another standard; 2) it provides strong editorial guidance for content that has been inconsistently modeled across extensions. Moreover, it squarely anchors care plans into information artifacts. No drawbacks come to mind. | |
| UK | 27MAR2017 | Although generally this is what the UK expected I will need to consult on the recommendations to retire the regime/therapy content as this may be being used as the actual procedure to manage a patient on a plan. If we could extend the deadline for feedback to the 14th April this should enable me to do this. | |
| DK | 27MAR2017 | Danish nurses tell me care plans are very relevant for them too, but presently the nurses do not have any comments to this proposal. | |
| Member countries without a CMAG rep |
...