Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

09/28/2016

1800 UTC

 

GoToMeeting Details

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/374912925

 Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.

Dial +1 (872) 240-3212
Access Code: 374-912-925
Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

Meeting ID: 374-912-925

Apologies

Objectives

  • Obtain consensus on agenda items

Discussion items

ItemDescriptionOwnerNotesAction
1Call to order and role callJCA

 

 

2Approval of 20160627 minutesJCA 
  •  Approve minutes from 06/27/2016

3Drug model contentJCA

Decision from Copenhagen 2015, that the prescribing use case is not going to be supported. Thus the need for universal restrictions in the DL is not needed at this time.

Questions regarding the names of drug products that contain SOME substances if we disallow the use of universal restrictions:

-          Which concepts have this potential problem?

-          How to construct the FSN to make it unambiguous?

-          If we change the FSN, is it a technical correction or retire and replace? 

 

 
4Assessment instrument responsesJCA

Policy on addition of assessment tool responses to the International edition.

IHTSDO currently accepts "names" of assessment instruments and staging scales; however, there is nothing in the editorial guide that specifically addresses the responses to assessment instrument questions. As many of these are extremely context dependent, being tied specifically to the particular instrument, what should be the policy of IHTSDO to requests to add assessment instrument responses to the International release.

Example: Requests to add responses to Tinetti balance assessment tool

 

 
5EAG self evaluationJCA

The EAG has been asked to do a self evaluation after the first two years of operarion. We need to answer the following questions given that the role of the EAG is advisory.

  1. Are the responsibilities of EAG members clear?
  2. Are the topics that have been discussed relevant to the expectations of the members?
  3. Is the operation of the committee satisfactory?
  4. Does the group feel that it has made substantial progress over the first two years?
  5. Should the EAG be continued for the next year?
 
6Goals for next yearEAGDevelop a set of 1-2 primary goals for the EAG for next year. What are the most important topics the group should attempt to address in the coming year? 
75Action item reviewEAG

Space Actions

 
68Potential agenda topics for Wellington meetingJCA

We are meeting for a full day in New Zealand. Need substantive topics to move forward.

 
79Additional itemsEAG  

Meeting Files

View file
nameTinettiBalanceAssessment.pdf
height250

Meeting minutes

2016-08-22 Editorial Advisory Group Conference Call

2016-08-22 Editorial AG Meeting Minutes