Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migration of unmigrated content due to installation of a new plugin

Discussion information box

A colleague has a question about the meaning and use case for the above concept which has no subtypes.
We already have 172508004 |Destruction of ciliary body (procedure)| and 231738000 |Partial excision of ciliary body (procedure)| which do have subtypes. These procedures can be performed either for size reduction of the ciliary body to reduce its functionality in glaucoma, or to destroy or remove lesions of the ciliary body. Given this, these procedures cannot be categorised as subtypes of "Reduction of ciliary body (procedure)".
If "Reduction of ciliary body (procedure)" cannot serve as an umbrella term for the various specific procedures used to achieve it, does it still make sense to keep this as an active concept? It seems unlikely that this code would be entered into an EMR, which would typically record the specific procedure performed.
If it is not useful, should it be inactivated as ambiguous, possibly equivalent to "Partial excision of ciliary body (procedure)" or "Destruction of ciliary body (procedure)"?
Many thanks for your input.

Discussion contributors