Search


Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The capture and exchange of adverse sensitivity data varies across EHRs. As an effect, much of this data is not interoperable across electronic systems. Confusion regarding the representation and definition of adverse sensitivity data within the EHR presents challenges to organizations that are trying to implement SNOMED CT for electronic data sharing. Further, this uncertainty limits the use of adverse sensitivity data for clinical decision support and longitudinal patient care records. The capture of allergy data must be clearly defined to support patient safety and a comprehensive health record.

Objective

Expand
titleExpand template notes...


Info
titleTemplate Notes

This section presents the objective of this guide. In a short and accurate manner, it presents the expectations to be satisfied when complying to the methods or artefacts presented in the guide.



This implementation guide is intended to accelerate consistent implementation of vocabulary with an emphasis on the use of SNOMED CT within the domain of adverse sensitivity and adverse reactions by:

...

  • Fill the knowledge gap in the community of practice by providing authoritative guidance and reference sets that can be used consistently for the representation of:
    • an allergy, non-allergic hypersensitivity and intolerance 
    • propensities and reactions
    • the criticality of the allergic condition (i.e. the potential seriousness of a future reaction)
    • the severity of a reaction 
  • Provide guidance for the aggregation & analysis of reported adverse drug reactions (ADR) and sharing/interoperability of ADR reports

Scope


Expand
titleExpand template notes...


Info
titleTemplate Notes

This section describes the scope of the document and the associated work.  

It should clearly describe the project constraints and limitation.

It should include information about what is included in the guide, but also clarify what is outside the scope of this work.


Our scope and approach was the following:

  1. Review definitions and reference standard publications
  2. Analyze relevant information models
    1. Review existing information models that are in scope, with special emphasis on HL7® FHIR® that has gained considerable momentum in recent years
    2. Create an inclusive model to harmonize the key data elements in the reviewed information models
  3. Create exemplar use cases
    1. Describe the most common and important scenarios for capturing or exchanging adverse sensitivity information
    2. Illustrate how the information can be represented by using FHIR® and SNOMED CT concepts
  4. Identify SNOMED CT reference sets
    1. Identify starter sets for large domains – most commonly used SNOMED CT concepts in clinical settings e.g., food allergens, adverse sensitivity reactions
    2. Identify value sets for specific data elements e.g., adverse sensitivity types, certainty, criticality, severity
  5. Provide practical guidance of the use of SNOMED CT in
    1. Allergy list
    2. Problem list
    3. Clinical decision support

Audience

Expand
titleExpand template notes...


Info
titleTemplate Notes

This section describes the target audience for the guide, and explains how they are expected to use the guide.



Attribution

Expand
titleExpand template notes...


Info
titleTemplate Notes

This section presents the main contributors to this guide, e.g. a Clinical Reference Group.

It also provides information about who to contact for questions about the work presented in the guide.



Guide overview

Expand
titleExpand template notes...


Info
titleTemplate Notes

This section provides an overview of the guide, including a description of the scope of each chapter.



Review

Expand
titleExpand template notes...


Info
titleTemplate Notes

This section provides information about the status of the work presented in this guide.

It presents the mechanism used to provide feedback, and it clarifies the review schedule.