Page tree

Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

CountryDateResponse
USA27OCT2020

The proposal seems generally reasonable.

A few value sets in NLM's Value Set Authority Center refer to Allergy to animal x dander (finding) concepts and will be directly affected if we do inactivation/creation rather than modification (which I can understand for editorial reasons).

I am wondering whether procedure concepts also referring to "animal x dander" remain appropriate or would need to be refactored similarly to the corresponding Allergy concepts – they could be similarly genericized (e.g., Cat allergen  specific immunoglobulin E antibody measurement). Just a thought.

NL27OCT2020Agreed!
IRL27/10/2020OK here, as these terms at not currently in use here.
AUS

 

Just checking the evaluation procedures/observables will remain as these seem to be pretty standard across the industry.

There are also tests for urine, serum, epithelium individually and combinations of

Otherwise, I think the change is reasonable for Clinical Findings. It's consistent to how 232350006|House dust mite allergy| is modelled.

Presumably, this doesn't just apply to dander but all the 'animal materials', ie. feathers.
Will this logic/pattern apply to reactions also? i.e. <<418448002|Allergic reaction caused by animal (disorder)| (although there's limited content here at the moment).

Will this pattern also be extended to plants? pollens/seed

Could just use even general substances like 'dog material substance' (Subtsance from dog)

DK

 

Are the FSN and PT in the example correct?

In the example if the PT is | Allergy to horse | the FSN would be | Allergy to horse protein |, but can you talk about at ‘horse protein’? This sounds especially strange if this statement in the Summary is true: “In addition, the same allergenic protein may be found in several different sources”. I suppose this means that the same allergenic protein can be found in e.g. a zebra and so it would not be a ‘horse protein’ only.

I am thinking that maybe the FSN should have been | Allergy to Animal protein x |, but this would not match the PT | Allergy to horse | either.

I am not an allergist, but a terminologist, so perhaps I just do not understand this subject. Perhaps an example with an actual case would be helpful? /Camilla










Member countries without a CMAG rep

...