...
Date | Requested action | Requester(s) | Response required by: | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 March 2020 | Input on additional description types |
| Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments below. |
Country response
| Country | Date | Response | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2020-03-23 | We already have language reference sets, which is a powerful tool to specify description use contexts such as (potentially) patient friendly/common language terms, speciality terms. Linguistic variants (abbreviations, singular/plural forms, some derivations) would still be considered acceptable synonyms and this We are still in the process of finding out what constitutes over use of language reference sets. "Search terms" we assume are generally not (true enough) synonyms and thus might require a new description type OR a new acceptability value and a slight(?) re-interpretation of what 900000000000013009 | Synonym (core metadata concept) | means. | ||
| Member countries without a CMAG rep |
...