...
For Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 12676007 |Fracture of radius| |
---|
|
, the relationship Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 363698007|Finding site| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 299701004|Bone structure of radius and/or ulna| |
---|
|
is inherited from Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 65966004|Fracture of forearm| |
---|
|
, which is a redundant relationship because Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 62413002|Bone structure of radius| |
---|
|
is a subtype of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 299701004|Bone structure of radius and/or ulna| |
---|
|
. The relationship Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 116676008|Associated morphology| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 19130008|Traumatic abnormality| |
---|
|
is inherited from Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 429353004|Injury of radius| |
---|
|
, which is a redundant relationship because Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 72704001|Fracture (morphologic abnormality)| |
---|
|
is a subtype of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 19130008|Traumatic abnormality| |
---|
|
.
Caption label |
---|
CapId | exampleexample1-in-owl-axiom-refset-and-rf2-relationship-file-nnf- |
---|
CapType | Table |
---|
|
Example in OWL axiom refset and RF2 relationship file (NNF) |
...
For concept Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 7246002|Kidney biopsy| |
---|
|
, the relationship Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 363704007|Procedure site| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 64033007|Kidney structure| |
---|
|
is inherited from Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 118851004|Procedure on kidney| |
---|
|
, which is a redundant relationship to Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 405813007|Procedure site - Direct| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 64033007|Kidney structure| |
---|
|
because Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 405813007|Procedure site - Direct| |
---|
|
is a subtype of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 363704007|Procedure site| |
---|
|
. Because Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 64033007|Kidney structure| |
---|
|
is a subtype of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 122489005|Urinary system structure| |
---|
|
and Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 82849001|Retroperitoneal compartment structure| |
---|
|
, the inherited relationships for Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 405813007|Procedure site - Direct| |
---|
|
are also redundant.
Caption label |
---|
CapId | exampleexample2-in-owl-axiom-refset-and-rf2-relationship-file-nnf- |
---|
CapType | Table |
---|
|
Example in OWL axiom refset and RF2 relationship file (NNF) |
...
For Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 422453004|Product containing ethyl morphine| |
---|
|
, the relationship Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 127489000|Has active ingredient| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 373529000|Morphine| |
---|
|
is inherited from Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 73572009|Product containing morphine| |
---|
|
. If the rule 1 for class inclusion was to apply, the relationships would not be considered as redundant because Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 74905005|Ethylmorphine (substance)| |
---|
|
is not a subconcept of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 373529000|Morphine (substance)| |
---|
|
. Because Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 74905005|Ethyl morphine| |
---|
|
Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 738774007|Is modification of| |
---|
|
Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 373529000|Morphine| |
---|
|
and property chain of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 127489000|Has active ingredient| |
---|
|
and Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 738774007|Is modification of| |
---|
|
is a sub-property of Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 127489000|Has active ingredient| |
---|
|
, the rule 2 actually compares the anonymous concepts for subsumption, i.e. Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 127489000|Has active ingredient (attribute)| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 373529000 |Morphine (substance)| |
---|
|
with Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 127489000|Has active ingredient| |
---|
|
= Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 74905005|Ethyl morphine| |
---|
|
. Therefore, the inherited relationship is redundant and can be removed from the NNF. Their relationships and property chain can be demonstrated in the following diagram.
Caption label |
---|
CapId | exampleexample3-in-owl-axiom-refset-and-rf2-relationship-file-nnf- |
---|
CapType | Table |
---|
|
Example in OWL axiom refset and RF2 relationship file (NNF) |
...
All
relationships should be assigned in role group 0;Attribute that is not grouped, not a value of
Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 609096000 |Role group (attribute)| |
---|
|
or grouped=0 in MRCM, should be assigned in role group 0;- Attribute that is grouped, value of
Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 609096000 |Role group (attribute)| |
---|
|
or grouped=1 in MRCM, should be assigned a role group number that is not 0. Each Concept |
---|
ShowParts | term |
---|
t | 609096000 |Role group (attribute)| |
---|
|
in the OWL axiom should be presented by a unique role group number. Note, role group merging is not covered here.
Concept |
---|
t | 609096000 |Role group (attribute)| |
---|
|
is explicitly represented for self-grouped attributes where there is only a single attribute in a role group in an OWL axiom. However, these self-grouped attributes and values are not explicitly represented in the current relationship files. This representation has caused confusion if an attribute in role group 0 is grouped or not. The following example demonstrates the changes to assignment of role group number after the implementation of the complete OWL axiom refset.
...