Search



Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

For

Concept
ShowPartsterm
t12676007 |Fracture of radius|
, the relationship
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t363698007|Finding site|
 = 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t299701004|Bone structure of radius and/or ulna|
is inherited from
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t65966004|Fracture of forearm|
, which is a redundant relationship because 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t62413002|Bone structure of radius|
is a subtype of
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t299701004|Bone structure of radius and/or ulna|
. The relationship 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t116676008|Associated morphology|
 = 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t19130008|Traumatic abnormality|
is inherited from
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t429353004|Injury of radius|
, which is a redundant relationship because 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t72704001|Fracture (morphologic abnormality)|
 is a subtype of
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t19130008|Traumatic abnormality|
.

Caption label
CapIdexampleexample1-in-owl-axiom-refset-and-rf2-relationship-file-nnf-
CapTypeTable
Example in OWL axiom refset and RF2 relationship file (NNF)

...

For concept

Concept
ShowPartsterm
t7246002|Kidney biopsy|
, the relationship 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t363704007|Procedure site|
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t64033007|Kidney structure|
is inherited from
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t118851004|Procedure on kidney|
, which is a redundant relationship to 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t405813007|Procedure site - Direct|
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t64033007|Kidney structure|
because 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t405813007|Procedure site - Direct|
is a subtype of
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t363704007|Procedure site|
. Because 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t64033007|Kidney structure|
is a subtype of 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t122489005|Urinary system structure|
and
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t82849001|Retroperitoneal compartment structure|
, the inherited relationships for 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t405813007|Procedure site - Direct|
are also redundant.

Caption label
CapIdexampleexample2-in-owl-axiom-refset-and-rf2-relationship-file-nnf-
CapTypeTable
Example in OWL axiom refset and RF2 relationship file (NNF)

...

For

Concept
ShowPartsterm
t422453004|Product containing ethyl morphine|
, the relationship 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t127489000|Has active ingredient|
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t373529000|Morphine|
 is inherited from
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t73572009|Product containing morphine|
. If the rule 1 for class inclusion was to apply, the relationships would not be considered as redundant because 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t74905005|Ethylmorphine (substance)|
 is not a subconcept of 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t373529000|Morphine (substance)|
.
Because 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t74905005|Ethyl morphine|
 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t738774007|Is modification of|
 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t373529000|Morphine|
and property chain of 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t127489000|Has active ingredient|
 and 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t738774007|Is modification of|
 is a sub-property of 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t127489000|Has active ingredient|
, the rule 2 actually compares the anonymous concepts for subsumption, i.e. 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t127489000|Has active ingredient (attribute)|
 = 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t373529000 |Morphine (substance)|
 with 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t127489000|Has active ingredient|
 = 
Concept
ShowPartsterm
t74905005|Ethyl morphine|
. Therefore, the inherited relationship is redundant and can be removed from the NNF.   Their relationships and property chain can be demonstrated in the following diagram.



Caption label
CapIdexampleexample3-in-owl-axiom-refset-and-rf2-relationship-file-nnf-
CapTypeTable
Example in OWL axiom refset and RF2 relationship file (NNF)

...

  1. All 

    Concept
    t116680003 |Is a|
     relationships should be assigned in role group 0;

  2. Attribute that is not grouped, not a value of 

    Concept
    ShowPartsterm
    t609096000 |Role group (attribute)|
     or grouped=0 in MRCM, should be assigned in role group 0;

  3. Attribute that is grouped, value of 
    Concept
    ShowPartsterm
    t609096000 |Role group (attribute)|
     or grouped=1 in MRCM, should be assigned a role group number that is not 0. Each 
    Concept
    ShowPartsterm
    t609096000 |Role group (attribute)|
     in the OWL axiom should be presented by a unique role group number. Note, role group merging is not covered here.

Concept
t609096000 |Role group (attribute)|
 is explicitly represented for self-grouped attributes where there is only a single attribute in a role group in an OWL axiom. However, these self-grouped attributes and values are not explicitly represented in the current relationship files. This representation has caused confusion if an attribute in role group 0 is grouped or not. The following example demonstrates the changes to assignment of role group number after the implementation of the complete OWL axiom refset.

...