Content Managers Advisory Group

Page tree

Summary

Request for input: 

  • Feedback on the Content Development Roadmap
    • Depth of information required
  • Value of the Daily build information for Members
  • What do Member Countries see as substantive changes that they would like notification on in advance?
DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
     
     

Content Development Roadmap: CDR

Daily build: https://dailybuild.ihtsdotools.org/qa/

EAG discussion on substance changes: 2017-04-25 Editorial Advisory Group Face to Face Meeting

CMAG meeting: 2017-04-26 - CMAG Meeting - Face to face in London, England

 

Relevant documents

  File Modified
Microsoft Word Document Content Dev Roadmap_Major Changes_Improvment_LP_20170531.docx 2017-May-31 by Linda Parisien

Actions: 

DateRequested actionRequester(s)Response required by:Comments
 26 April 2017
  • Content Development Roadmap (Link above
    • Does the Roadmap provide a sufficient level of information in regards to planned areas of work?
    • What additional information is required to provide Members with a sufficient level of detail?
  • Daily build information e.g. statistics, patterns
    • Please review the information here and comment on the value of this to assist you with understanding the changes that are coming.
  • What does this group see as the types of substantive changes that would be of value to hear about in advance?

 

 

  • Camilla Wiberg Danielsen Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • Daniel Karlsson Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas   
  • Elaine Wooler Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • Elze de Groot  Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • John Fountain  Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • Linda Parisien Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • Matt Cordell Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • Olivier Bodenreider Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  
  • Jostein Ven Please see Changes to Content topic page and provide feedback on the requested areas  

Please post your final responses in the Country response table below. Discussion comments can be made as comments.


Country response 

CountryDateResponse
Canada 20170531  Please find my comments in the attached file
 UK 07/06/2017

 Apologies for not providing more detailed feedback.  I presented this to our Implementation Forum on the 1st June and have asked for feedback.   I agree with Linda's comments in section C of the type of changes we would like to see.  For us this would also include changes to file structures or anything that might impact supplier load routines.  High usage content areas are very important - it might be useful if we highlight some areas to you though some will be obvious I would think.

The daily build is a very useful tool in particular the statistics and being able to drill down to see the detail behind the numbers.

Overall this is a great advance in what used to be there and makes finding information a lot easier.

   
   
   
   
   
  

 

   
Member countries without a CMAG rep  

 

CMAG response

DateCMAG ResponseNext steps
   
   
   

 

Final outcome: 

Date: 

 

  • No labels